Who Is Horse Of The Year?

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Travis Stone

I'm having a hard time swallowing this. If taking one chance in a big race trumps taking a chance in two or three races, and winning each time, then what's next?

As of right now there is no critaria for selecting HOY, it is simply who each voter thinks Horse of the Yr is as White explained last night. With this you can expect open intrepretations who that is. I posted this morning that Steve was right on when he said we are so conditioned with beyers these days that alot of us underestimated her going into the Classic, winning 13 races on synth regardless if one believes the competition is bad is not as easy on the surface as it may look. Look at Richard's Kid, the results can be random...I can own up to maybe erroring on my opinion of her prior to the BC Classic and getting sucked into the void of that she was beating inferior fillies on a junk track. Regardless what she did on Sat was special, when you look at the way it all played out, no pace, losing a pace threat a min prior to post, flat footed start, and then the ease she won coming down the lane, it was a game changer and I think it's sad that people let what was a conservative campaign until the Classic get in the way of recognizing greatness.

[kgar311]

Originally Posted by CSC

As of right now there is no critaria for selecting HOY, it is simply who each voter thinks Horse of the Yr is as White explained last night. With this you can expect open intrepretations who that is. I posted this morning that Steve was right on when he said we are so conditioned with beyers these days that alot of us underestimated her going into the Classic, winning 13 races on synth regardless if one believes the competition is bad is not as easy on the surface as it may look. Look at Richard's Kid, the results can be random...I can own up to maybe erroring on my opinion of her prior to the BC Classic and getting sucked into the void of that she was beating inferior fillies on a junk track. Regardless what she did on Sat was special, when you look at the way it all played out, no pace, losing a pace threat a min prior to post, flat footed start, and then the ease she won coming down the lane, it was a game changer and I think it's sad that people let what was a conservative campaign until the Classic get in the way of recognizing greatness.

The handlers have no one else to blame but themselves. If they wanted HOY so bad they should of taken on and beaten all comers. I dont think she was at the top of her game all year. She did throw in 2 clunkers and the weakness of the field was the only thing that saved her. That being said, if she ran against the boys those days she would have been beaten. But they stayed with the girls to fluff up her numbers and that is what is going to cost her HOY. May this be a lesson to all horse owners and trainers, if you want the accolades dont hide in the corner all year while someone else is doing all the work and jump out in the end and try and do one thing and steal the credit.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by CSC

As of right now there is no critaria for selecting HOY, it is simply who each voter thinks Horse of the Yr is as White explained last night. With this you can expect open intrepretations who that is. I posted this morning that Steve was right on when he said we are so conditioned with beyers these days that alot of us underestimated her going into the Classic, winning 13 races on synth regardless if one believes the competition is bad is not as easy on the surface as it may look. Look at Richard's Kid, the results can be random...I can own up to maybe erroring on my opinion of her prior to the BC Classic and getting sucked into the void of that she was beating inferior fillies on a junk track. Regardless what she did on Sat was special, when you look at the way it all played out, no pace, losing a pace threat a min prior to post, flat footed start, and then the ease she won coming down the lane, it was a game changer and I think it's sad that people let what was a conservative campaign until the Classic get in the way of recognizing greatness.

Because greatness should not/cannot be proven in one race in my opinion. Greatness is doing something beyond the ordinary once and then again, maybe even a few more times.

The difference between a campaign like Ghostzapper's and that of Zenyatta's was that his showed brilliance stretched over three different distances, even if it was only four races (of course she only ran five). He also squashed a much better Classic field.

NT

[CSC]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Because greatness should not/cannot be proven in one race in my opinion. Greatness is doing something beyond the ordinary once and then again, maybe even a few more times.

The difference between a campaign like Ghostzapper's and that of Zenyatta's was that his showed brilliance stretched over three different distances, even if it was only four races (of course she only ran five). He also squashed a much better Classic field.

NT

We can talk for days regarding greatness, one thing I don't agree with is the citing of beyers as the definitive rule for how good a horse is, they are useful and are great from a conversational viewpoint but they should never be the absolute in determining that one horse can beat another when comparing horses.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Because greatness should not/cannot be proven in one race in my opinion. Greatness is doing something beyond the ordinary once and then again, maybe even a few more times.

Hmmm, how many major horses, the type who have won a whole bunch of grade 1's, have finished unbeaten. Is it a big number?

How many fillies have won the classic?

How many horses have come from last in every race to run by the entire field?

Those three things, I guess they are ordinary everyday events.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

Hmmm, how many major horses, the type who have won a whole bunch of grade 1's, have finished unbeaten. Is it a big number?

How many fillies have won the classic?

How many horses have come from last in every race to run by the entire field?

Those three things, I guess they are ordinary everyday events.

And how many of them were predicted to be the 3rd or 4th choice by people on message boards?

NT

[South Beach Luv]

Gulfstream wants to decide it on their track in Feb.

http://blog.timesunion.com/horseraci...zenyatta/3629/

[jms62]

Originally Posted by South Beach Luv

Gulfstream wants to decide it on their track in Feb.

http://blog.timesunion.com/horseraci...zenyatta/3629/

Enormous stage and will be the Hot place to be pre Super Bowl. Horse racing needs it but I won't hold my breath

[randallscott35]

Oh yes waiving the fees will get it done.

How about 5 Mill instead.

[kgar311]

Originally Posted by South Beach Luv

Gulfstream wants to decide it on their track in Feb.

http://blog.timesunion.com/horseraci...zenyatta/3629/

Man, you mean to tell me that there arent enough"rich" people out there, owners, sheiks, heads of state or people in general that would want more then anything to make this happen? Start hitting people up for loot, sponsorships hang banners along the track like they do overseas on the backstretch. What about striking a deal with Fox to televise and take all the tv money and put towards the race. Race one day SB the next, ratings would be through the roof, im sure there are plenty of smart people that can make this happen. They can raise enough money to bring them both there.

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by kgar311

Man, you mean to tell me that there arent enough"rich" people out there, owners, sheiks, heads of state or people in general that would want more then anything to make this happen? Start hitting people up for loot, sponsorships hang banners along the track like they do overseas on the backstretch. What about striking a deal with Fox to televise and take all the tv money and put towards the race. Race one day SB the next, ratings would be through the roof, im sure there are plenty of smart people that can make this happen. They can raise enough money to bring them both there.

Yeah, but Zenyatta won't show..why bother with all this hype when you know she won't ship there. Just like she wouldn't have run at CD this year. Doesn't mean that RA is or isn't HOY, but all this "let them decide it on the track" is just wishful thinking.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

And how many of them were predicted to be the 3rd or 4th choice by people on message boards?

NT

apples and oranges, but yea I was wrong on the odds, not as wrong as you are on this one but wrong.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

apples and oranges, but yea I was wrong on the odds, not as wrong as you are on this one but wrong.

I wouldn't have brought it back up if you hadn't said to me that I'd be proven wrong.

Nowhere in my post did I say that Zenyatta was not a great horse. I simply said, and maintain that greatness is not attained with one effort. She has had a tremendous career and capped it off with an effort for the ages. However, the nod for HOY shouldn't go to her because of the one performance, in my opinion, at least not in a year where there was another horse like Rachel Alexandra.

NT

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

I wouldn't have brought it back up if you hadn't said to me that I'd be proven wrong.

Nowhere in my post did I say that Zenyatta was not a great horse. I simply said, and maintain that greatness is not attained with one effort. She has had a tremendous career and capped it off with an effort for the ages. However, the nod for HOY shouldn't go to her because of the one performance, in my opinion, at least not in a year where there was another horse like Rachel Alexandra.

NT

I disagreed with the statement that the classic was the only non ordinary thing she has done

[Travis Stone]

Originally Posted by CSC

As of right now there is no critaria for selecting HOY, it is simply who each voter thinks Horse of the Yr is as White explained last night. With this you can expect open intrepretations who that is. I posted this morning that Steve was right on when he said we are so conditioned with beyers these days that alot of us underestimated her going into the Classic, winning 13 races on synth regardless if one believes the competition is bad is not as easy on the surface as it may look. Look at Richard's Kid, the results can be random...I can own up to maybe erroring on my opinion of her prior to the BC Classic and getting sucked into the void of that she was beating inferior fillies on a junk track. Regardless what she did on Sat was special, when you look at the way it all played out, no pace, losing a pace threat a min prior to post, flat footed start, and then the ease she won coming down the lane, it was a game changer and I think it's sad that people let what was a conservative campaign until the Classic get in the way of recognizing greatness.

I recognize greatness... she was great, it was an awesome performance. Yeah, she had a pretty darn good trip for a closer and the slow start is overrated for a horse with her style, but sure, it was awesome and exciting. Great, indeed.

Unfortunately for her, someone was greater. I'm not knocking Zenyatta at all... quite the contrary. If I'm knocking anything, it's her campaign, which in the big picture was not nearly as great as Rachel's. Yeah, her ace in the hole is the Classic, but that does not trump a Preakness, Haskell and Woodward win in my opinion, nor should it.