Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2009, 11:05 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
Balt played a much better game and will beat them if they play in the playoffs. Write it down.
Baltimore was probably the better team - but they turned the ball over twice in critical spots ... though NE did give up a strip sack for a defensive BALT TD at a point in the game where NE looked like they'd win easily.

It was very close. Baltimore said they were going to take Moss out of the game .. and they did. But Brady played a smart game and didn't even look to Moss and picked Balt apart with mismatches underneath .. they just couldn't run the ball well on Balt.

And when you can't run the ball consistantly - and don't look at Moss - you have to do all of your dinking and dunking without costly penalties or turnovers that stop drives. And it was Baltimore, for the most part, who had more of the costly penalties and key turnovers.

Baltimore did send an overload blitz at Brady on a key 3rd down .. and he basically got rid of it as fast as possible by lobbing up a quick no look duck for Moss to go get for the game winning TD.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2009, 11:55 AM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Nobody loves Tom Brady any more than i do but it looked pretty clear to me that the best QB on that field was Mr. Flacco. Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2009, 03:17 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Docicu said some medical person jibberish about Brady that makes me think he will improve a lot more as the season goes on.

Flacco is excellent for a 2nd year qb ... though he does have a good line, good running game, and very good defense to take the pressure off of him.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2009, 04:34 PM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Docicu said some medical person jibberish about Brady that makes me think he will improve a lot more as the season goes on.

Flacco is excellent for a 2nd year qb ... though he does have a good line, good running game, and very good defense to take the pressure off of him.
Brady is not completely healed and won't be for awhile very much like C Palmer when he ripped his ACL up.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2009, 03:19 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Nobody loves Tom Brady any more than i do but it looked pretty clear to me that the best QB on that field was Mr. Flacco. Any thoughts?
I thought Flacco was incredibly overrated last year and got way too much credit for Baltimore's success. This year though he has made the leap. He is legitimately a very good NFL QB. He made a few throws that only Peyton Manning can make.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2009, 03:31 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

I agree that Flacco has all of those things. The only thing he doesnt have is a receiver unless you count Mason who is a little past his prime. Can you imagine what this kid could do with a real receiver? Some like...Mr Owens?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2009, 05:46 PM
3kings's Avatar
3kings 3kings is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
I agree that Flacco has all of those things. The only thing he doesnt have is a receiver unless you count Mason who is a little past his prime. Can you imagine what this kid could do with a real receiver? Some like...Mr Owens?
Owens is also past his prime. I would take Mason over Owens any day. More consistent route runner and better hands and NO DRAMA. Owens still has the edge on speed and strength but is not as reliable. What Mason really needs is Baltimore to get another legitimate NFL receiver.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2009, 06:36 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3kings
I would take Mason over Owens any day.
I laughed.


One thing I never liked about Owens though is that he doesn't look natural. That's one of the things I've always liked the most about Moss.

Owens would have been better for the Raiders than Moss.

With Moss, if you can get enough pass protection to get him deep and have him run deep double moves ... you have an extremely dangerous offense no matter who else you have at any other position.

If your offensive line can't pass block though ... Owens is still pretty dangerous. A guy like Hines Ward who's gritty and a great blocker also would have been a better option for the Raiders the way that team was set up when Moss was there.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2009, 12:41 PM
Bigsmc's Avatar
Bigsmc Bigsmc is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,577
Default Could he possibly say this with a straight face?

http://blogs.tampabay.com/bucs/2009/...explosive.html

Awesome stuff.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.