Which top 4 is a bigger laughingstock?

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Yeah - it was very shrwed placement.

She was 5th, got beat about 10 lengths at 15/1 odds, with a 109 Beyer.

That year's Distaff was won by Ashado with a 102.

And nobody would have cared about her winning the Distaff for a second time. Whether she raced there or not didn't change the fact that we already knew she was the best older female in the country. The greats become the greats because they are always taking on new challenges, not handling the same ones over and over.

I only wish that Azeri could have been tried in some of those spots in 2003 instead of having to wait another year. As good as she was in 2004, I thought she was better in 2003.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

And nobody would have cared about her winning the Distaff for a second time. Whether she raced there or not didn't change the fact that we already knew she was the best older female in the country. The greats become the greats because they are always taking on new challenges, not handling the same ones over and over.

I only wish that Azeri could have been tried in some of those spots in 2003 instead of having to wait another year. As good as she was in 2004, I thought she was better in 2003.

If you're trying to argue that a 5th place finish in the Classic did more for Azeri's legacy than winning a 2nd Distaff would have, I couldn't possibly disagree more. She finished 5th, it's not like she contended, even if it was one of the toughest Classic fields ever. I agree with you in general when it comes to trying bold things with exceptionally talented female horses, but this was not a case where Azeri had nothing left to prove. A 2nd Distaff would have been another feather in her cap, or at least more of one than a 5th in the Classic.

I also wasn't certain that she was the best female in the country at that time. She traded decisions with Sightseek (who was a Belmont horse for course) but neither had proven they were decidedly better than the other.

[Sightseek]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

If you're trying to argue that a 5th place finish in the Classic did more for Azeri's legacy than winning a 2nd Distaff would have, I couldn't possibly disagree more. She finished 5th, it's not like she contended, even if it was one of the toughest Classic fields ever. I agree with you in general when it comes to trying bold things with exceptionally talented female horses, but this was not a case where Azeri had nothing left to prove. A 2nd Distaff would have been another feather in her cap, or at least more of one than a 5th in the Classic.

I also wasn't certain that she was the best female in the country at that time. She traded decisions with Sightseek (who was a Belmont horse for course) but neither had proven they were decidedly better than the other.

She was more than a Belmont horse, watch her Rampart, Go For Wand the year earlier and Humana Distaff!

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by Sightseek

She was more than a Belmont horse, watch her Rampart, Go For Wand the year earlier and Humana Distaff!

Well I was referring to 2004, so the Rampart would apply, but I think it's safe to say that Sightseek (from October 2003 to the end) excelled at Belmont.

NT

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Well I was referring to 2004, so the Rampart would apply, but I think it's safe to say that Sightseek (from October 2003 to the end) excelled at Belmont.

NT

Sightseek was pretty much fine everywhere ... I know she was 0-for-5 at Santa Anita - had a couple of bad 4ths there - and was beaten everytime she shipped West ... but, she had a few good races there in defeat earlier on in her career.

[10 pnt move up]

Sightseek got smoked at 2/5 by Adoration in the biggest race of her life, that says it all to me.

[Travis Stone]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

Sightseek got smoked at 2/5 by Adoration in the biggest race of her life, that says it all to me.

She was much better than that performance would indicate. She was also much much much much better at Belmont Park.

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

If you're trying to argue that a 5th place finish in the Classic did more for Azeri's legacy than winning a 2nd Distaff would have, I couldn't possibly disagree more. She finished 5th, it's not like she contended, even if it was one of the toughest Classic fields ever. I agree with you in general when it comes to trying bold things with exceptionally talented female horses, but this was not a case where Azeri had nothing left to prove. A 2nd Distaff would have been another feather in her cap, or at least more of one than a 5th in the Classic.

I also wasn't certain that she was the best female in the country at that time. She traded decisions with Sightseek (who was a Belmont horse for course) but neither had proven they were decidedly better than the other.

Ok, let me ask you this question. Going into the BC, pretty much everyone had Azeri and Sightseek as the 1/2 older females in the country, in either order right? If you thought Azeri was #1 going in and she would have won the Distaff, how would that have changed your opinion of her? If you thought she was #2 going in, how would a win in a Distaff lacking Sightseek have changed your opinion? I don't think a win would have changed opinions either way. However, as close as the race between them was, a loss in the Distaff would have likely cost her the championship. I thought the Distaff was a no-win situation while the Classic was a no-lose situation.