Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-11-2009, 02:48 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

While you cant blame people who speak on the radio for someone elses radical actions, is it disgusting the hate that is purged from the mouths of people like Coulter, and Rush, etc.

Why shouldnt Coulter be held responsible for saying that jews need to be perfected by being Christians... That shouldnt even be allowed to be said on the radio, its pure hate and disgusting, and should make all decent human beings feel sick.


the Grand Ol' Party will never be accepted like it used to inless it looks like a party that is accepting of all people. Not just rich white people. That might have been okay years and years ago when hate was acceptable, but thankfully the younger generation, at least.. is beyond all that.

And its quite ashame because the BLUE party is the other option and that is just
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-2009, 02:58 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
While you cant blame people who speak on the radio for someone elses radical actions, is it disgusting the hate that is purged from the mouths of people like Coulter, and Rush, etc.

Why shouldnt Coulter be held responsible for saying that jews need to be perfected by being Christians... That shouldnt even be allowed to be said on the radio, its pure hate and disgusting, and should make all decent human beings feel sick.


the Grand Ol' Party will never be accepted like it used to inless it looks like a party that is accepting of all people. Not just rich white people. That might have been okay years and years ago when hate was acceptable, but thankfully the younger generation, at least.. is beyond all that.

And its quite ashame because the BLUE party is the other option and that is just
The media has painted this picture of all republicans being radicalized and polarizing figures and it simply isnt true. There is no doubt that the mainstream media will do whatever it can to hold onto the ideological advantage that they now maintain with liberal control of the govt. Rush and Coulter and Hannity and the rest are simply playing to their rather sizable audiences. They aren't political commentators as much as "entertainers". The former President was called far worse things by Olberman and crew. He was and continues to be brutalized in the media yet because it falls under similar political leanings of the majority of the media that is simply brushed aside. There is no doubt that the Liberals here HATE George Bush far more than most Conservatives dislike Obama. But that isn't the sexy argument.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:02 PM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

don't forget the republican party sent the 1st african american to the supreme court and attempted to send the 1st hispanic to the dc court of appeals (2nd highest court in the coutry) and the democrtic party the part of the people didn't even give miguel a vote ...talk about being out of touch
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:05 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
don't forget the republican party sent the 1st african american to the supreme court and attempted to send the 1st hispanic to the dc court of appeals (2nd highest court in the coutry) and the democrtic party the part of the people didn't even give miguel a vote ...talk about being out of touch
Clarence Thomas? LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:24 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Clarence Thomas? LOL.
Is he not black?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:53 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
don't forget the republican party sent the 1st african american to the supreme court and attempted to send the 1st hispanic to the dc court of appeals (2nd highest court in the coutry) and the democrtic party the part of the people didn't even give miguel a vote ...talk about being out of touch
lyndon johnson was a republican?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:04 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The media has painted this picture of all republicans being radicalized and polarizing figures and it simply isnt true. There is no doubt that the mainstream media will do whatever it can to hold onto the ideological advantage that they now maintain with liberal control of the govt. Rush and Coulter and Hannity and the rest are simply playing to their rather sizable audiences. They aren't political commentators as much as "entertainers". The former President was called far worse things by Olberman and crew. He was and continues to be brutalized in the media yet because it falls under similar political leanings of the majority of the media that is simply brushed aside. There is no doubt that the Liberals here HATE George Bush far more than most Conservatives dislike Obama. But that isn't the sexy argument.
thats an interesting thought. Im not sure if i agree or disagree with it either. You should put that out as a seperate topic but use the public as a whole.

There is no liberal on this website that hates bush as much as Dellinger63 or Timmig hates obama.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:24 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
thats an interesting thought. Im not sure if i agree or disagree with it either. You should put that out as a seperate topic but use the public as a whole.

There is no liberal on this website that hates bush as much as Dellinger63 or Timmig hates obama.
I know that those guys dont like Obama but the libs here hate Bush. The hatred for Bush by some people was as intense as I have ever seen for a public figure not named Howard Cosell.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:28 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I know that those guys dont like Obama but the libs here hate Bush. The hatred for Bush by some people was as intense as I have ever seen for a public figure not named Howard Cosell.
I don't hate Bush. I hate Cheney but Bush seems a decent enough guy, a horrible president, but a decent enough guy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:33 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
I don't hate Bush. I hate Cheney but Bush seems a decent enough guy, a horrible president, but a decent enough guy.
I was about to write the exact same thing. In my mind being incompetent isn't a "hate-worthy" offense.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-11-2009, 04:09 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
I was about to write the exact same thing. In my mind being incompetent isn't a "hate-worthy" offense.
Ditto.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:36 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I know that those guys dont like Obama but the libs here hate Bush. The hatred for Bush by some people was as intense as I have ever seen for a public figure not named Howard Cosell.
Seriously, Dellinger63? Come on Chuck. If you want to take out Dellinger63 and Timmig and I will take out a couple of flaming liberals (me first ) then it is actually debatable.

Dellinger63 actually wakes up in the morning and before kissing his girlfriend/wife, brushing his teeth or even peeing, he is googling obama articles to post.

The guy hates obama.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:52 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Seriously, Dellinger63? Come on Chuck. If you want to take out Dellinger63 and Timmig and I will take out a couple of flaming liberals (me first ) then it is actually debatable.

Dellinger63 actually wakes up in the morning and before kissing his girlfriend/wife, brushing his teeth or even peeing, he is googling obama articles to post.

The guy hates obama.
I think he likes to point out all the issues with Obama but I never sensed any hatred of the man.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:53 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I think he likes to point out all the issues with Obama but I never sensed any hatred of the man.
Chuck...please
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:13 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The media has painted this picture of all republicans being radicalized and polarizing figures and it simply isnt true. There is no doubt that the mainstream media will do whatever it can to hold onto the ideological advantage that they now maintain with liberal control of the govt. Rush and Coulter and Hannity and the rest are simply playing to their rather sizable audiences. They aren't political commentators as much as "entertainers". The former President was called far worse things by Olberman and crew. He was and continues to be brutalized in the media yet because it falls under similar political leanings of the majority of the media that is simply brushed aside. There is no doubt that the Liberals here HATE George Bush far more than most Conservatives dislike Obama. But that isn't the sexy argument.

I dont think ALL republicans are radical... but I wouldnt be shocked to hear that 15% of conservatives are radical right wing holier than tho people.

And that includes Coulter and Rush.. the people who are being heard the most. And it spreads a terrible message.

Shoot I go and read the politics section of Pace Advantage... my lord I'm conservative and i'd get ripped to shreads if I posted there. Very anti-anyone who isnt Christian. The people who post comments on the Foxnews website are the same way. Its actually quite scary and sick.

There are a ton of very stable & open minded - accepting and loving Republicans out there... thats just not what is being heard on the radio and such, the nutjobs have the loudest voices. And I feel its a big problem.

And I do have a HUGE problem with someone like Coulter saying Jews need to be perfected by becoming Christians. It makes me physically ill. Shouldnt even be allowed to be said under the first amendment. She should get charged with a hate crime for that.

Just because Liberals bashed Bush over everything, doesnt mean Repubs need to attack Obama PERSONALLY... personal attacks are "he's a muslim" "he's not born in the USA", "he's a terrorist" stuff like that should be off limits. It makes us look just plain stupid.

Its fine and dandy to verbally disagree with his policies, just like dem's did with Bush... but the conservatives are just out of hand right now.. and a small percentage of them are making the entire group look bad. Kind of like Muslims, (a small percentage makes the whole society look bad) just A WHOLE LOT LESS EXTREME.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:47 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
And I do have a HUGE problem with someone like Coulter saying Jews need to be perfected by becoming Christians. It makes me physically ill. Shouldnt even be allowed to be said under the first amendment.
And that was the point of the article.

Where do we draw the line between suggesting the Abortion Doctor should be killed as Bill O'Reilly did, and someone killing him?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-11-2009, 03:39 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The media has painted this picture of all republicans being radicalized and polarizing figures and it simply isnt true. .
Baloney. It was the GOP that allowed that to happen. No, correct that - they ENCOURAGED it to happen.

To get Bush re-elected the last time, the GOP gave increased voice to the 25% of the radial, polarized, ultra-conservative far right portion of the party.

The GOP ginned these polarized radicals up again by choosing Palin and letting her open her mouth. The Palin rallies were scary, racist, filled with lies. Palin herself is responsible, she encouraged it. That's why they chose her.

But it backfired big time, resulting in a good portion of the GOP voting Democratic this time. Until the extremists are dampened back down, the GOP is useless, and nobody will see that "it simply isnt true".

As lifelong GOP (I even loved Rumsfeld), to have extremists like Dell tell me "you're not a Republican" is laughable and ludicrous.

But as long as the GOP decides that is the voice of the party, the party will have no voice.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-11-2009, 04:00 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Baloney. It was the GOP that allowed that to happen. No, correct that - they ENCOURAGED it to happen.

To get Bush re-elected the last time, the GOP gave increased voice to the 25% of the radial, polarized, ultra-conservative far right portion of the party.

The GOP ginned these polarized radicals up again by choosing Palin and letting her open her mouth. The Palin rallies were scary, racist, filled with lies. Palin herself is responsible, she encouraged it. That's why they chose her.

But it backfired big time, resulting in a good portion of the GOP voting Democratic this time. Until the extremists are dampened back down, the GOP is useless, and nobody will see that "it simply isnt true".

As lifelong GOP (I even loved Rumsfeld), to have extremists like Dell tell me "you're not a Republican" is laughable and ludicrous.

But as long as the GOP decides that is the voice of the party, the party will have no voice.
This is ridiculous. If the GOP was playing to the radicals why was John McCain the nominee? You take the liberal bait, hook, line and sinker.

And you are just as intolerant as the right by calling Palin's rallies racist and filled with lies.

And you hardly seem to have a single non liberal view so maybe mr Extreme is right?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-11-2009, 04:03 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
This is ridiculous. If the GOP was playing to the radicals why was John McCain the nominee? You take the liberal bait, hook, line and sinker.

And you are just as intolerant as the right by calling Palin's rallies racist and filled with lies.

And you hardly seem to have a single non liberal view so maybe mr Extreme is right?
Because John McCain moved drastically to the right in order to be appealing to the radicals. Remember the whole 2000 John McCain calling Jerry Falwell an agent of intolerance and then 2006 John McCain doing the commencement speech at his good buddy Jerry Falwell's Liberty University?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-11-2009, 04:11 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
Because John McCain moved drastically to the right in order to be appealing to the radicals. Remember the whole 2000 John McCain calling Jerry Falwell an agent of intolerance and then 2006 John McCain doing the commencement speech at his good buddy Jerry Falwell's Liberty University?
He hardly moved drastically to the right. He was the GOP nominee for President, was he supposed to insult Falwell again?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.