Derby Winner vs. Oaks Winner

CSC · #1 05-16-2009, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigsmc

She's 20 lengths better than the other fillies. Nobody said she was 20 lengths better than every other horse.

Perhaps it wasn't said, but it sure sounded like it might have been inferred. You would have thought she would have won the Preakness by more than a length. Looks she's a very good filly and she may go down as one of the greats, I just wouldn't classify her great yet. It's premature for that if anyone should ask me.

King Glorious · #2 05-16-2009, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC

Perhaps it wasn't said, but it sure sounded like it might have been inferred. You would have thought she would have won the Preakness by more than a length. Looks she's a very good filly and she may go down as one of the greats, I just wouldn't classify her great yet. It's premature for that if anyone should ask me.

I don't think it was anywhere close to inferred that she was 20 lengths better than the boys. Maybe a couple of lengths at best was what even her biggest fans were saying.

CSC · #3 05-16-2009, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious

I don't think it was anywhere close to inferred that she was 20 lengths better than the boys. Maybe a couple of lengths at best was what even her biggest fans were saying.

I was ofcourse was saying it tongue in cheek, there's only one horse 20 lengths well 31 lenghts better than the boys and he is no longer with us. I think we can assume this without using semantics she was 8-5 today and the second choice was 6-1 that we had an overwhelming favorite in a field.

Merlinsky · #4 05-16-2009, 08:17 PM

To be fair, if that's her version of struggling over the track (according to Calvin) then good grief. I mean other horses have a bad day, they finish up the track. She just doesn't win by as much.

philcski · #5 05-16-2009, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC

Perhaps it wasn't said, but it sure sounded like it might have been inferred. You would have thought she would have won the Preakness by more than a length. Looks she's a very good filly and she may go down as one of the greats, I just wouldn't classify her great yet. It's premature for that if anyone should ask me.

I would. And I don't say that unless I'm absolutely sure.

smarty_all_out · #6 05-16-2009, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

I would. And I don't say that unless I'm absolutely sure.

Translation. "Dont hate".

Sightseek · #7 05-16-2009, 09:54 PM

So, of the fillies who have won a Triple Crown race, who was the best?

philcski · #8 05-16-2009, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek

So, of the fillies who have won a Triple Crown race, who was the best?

It may just be Rachel.

I don't think people realize what an incredible race she ran today. That track was DEEP, she set extremely fast fractions while 3 wide and still opened up enough to hold on. She wasn't even looking all that comfortable out there when she went by us, unlike at CD where she was absolutely on cruise control.

Winning Colors and Geniune Risk beat better horses, however.

Port Conway Lane · #9 05-16-2009, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

It may just be Rachel.

I don't think people realize what an incredible race she ran today. That track was DEEP, she set extremely fast fractions while 3 wide and still opened up enough to hold on. She wasn't even looking all that comfortable out there when she went by us, unlike at CD where she was absolutely on cruise control.

Winning Colors and Geniune Risk beat better horses, however.

I can remember maybe two horses from that crop(not that my memory or lack therof matters) but I thought that crop was relatively weak and contributed to the decision to run her.Colonel Moran and Rockhill Native maybe? I can't recall another.

Danzig · #10 05-16-2009, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane

I can remember maybe two horses from that crop(not that my memory or lack therof matters) but I thought that crop was relatively weak and contributed to the decision to run her.Colonel Moran and Rockhill Native maybe? I can't recall another.

plugged nickel was an incredibly bred horse.

regardless of what else rachel does, there isn't a filly out there currently, or in the past, that has accomplished what risk did in her tc run. alydar will live on in our minds forever, and even he didn't accomplish what the firestone filly did. first in the derby, second in the preakness (a race comparable to the 'fighting finish') and belmont. no filly has ever come close to that. will one do that? that remains to be seen. rachel has gotten a lot of buzz-i'm enjoying the hell out of her. but like i said the other day, let's not get ahead of ourselves.....

as for why she ran, risk ran a credible third in the wood memorial, which lead to her owners (but not her trainer initially) to think she could handle the opposite sex in the derby...

FATPIANO · #11 05-18-2009, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek

So, of the fillies who have won a Triple Crown race, who was the best?

Genuine Risk

Antitrust32 · #12 05-18-2009, 12:41 PM

I'm not sure how good Regret was cause I dont know anything about her, but her name keeps popping up in the history books.

CSC · #13 05-16-2009, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski

I would. And I don't say that unless I'm absolutely sure.

I guess that depends on what each and everyone's meaning of the word 'great' is Phil. That's fair I can respect your opinion, I need to see more before declaring her great though.

NTamm1215 · #14 05-16-2009, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC

Perhaps it wasn't said, but it sure sounded like it might have been inferred. You would have thought she would have won the Preakness by more than a length. Looks she's a very good filly and she may go down as one of the greats, I just wouldn't classify her great yet. It's premature for that if anyone should ask me.

What more does she have to do? Do you understand how infrequently what she just did happens? It takes a very special filly to win a Triple Crown race and in my opinion (while I hate the semantics of good, great, superstar, etc) it's an automatic qualifier to being a "great" horse.

NT

CSC · #15 05-16-2009, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

What more does she have to do? Do you understand how infrequently what she just did happens? It takes a very special filly to win a Triple Crown race and in my opinion (while I hate the semantics of good, great, superstar, etc) it's an automatic qualifier to being a "great" horse.

NT

Eight Belles ran second in the derby last year, Zarkava won the Arc. I know what you are saying when a filly beats the boys it is a superlative performance. I have to be honest though, it was a very good performance just not a great one. Frankly I was more impressed by her Oaks performance.

King Glorious · #16 05-16-2009, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

What more does she have to do? Do you understand how infrequently what she just did happens? It takes a very special filly to win a Triple Crown race and in my opinion (while I hate the semantics of good, great, superstar, etc) it's an automatic qualifier to being a "great" horse.

NT

I don't think it takes as special a filly as people think. I think that with more opportunities, it could have happened more. It's happened twice in the last six races. Do you think Rags to Riches was great too? I'm hoping that with this result, with Eight Belles, and with Rags, the American attitude will start to change and we'll see it happen more times and with more chances will come more success.