![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chief Officer is a girl
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ny breds really are not competitive. sorry but they are not very good. i would take KY, FL, CA over ny breds.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() are you insane ? ever hear of Behaving Badly ? Fleet Indian ? Funny Cide ? Say Florida Sandy ?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Find the thread about "breeding", the stallion thread..over rated and under. Revolution asked. I need your two cents. Seems this one poooh pooohs too much. Might just be a curious kid. I was one also. Might be time for him to listen. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Just don't under rate nybreds. Many good horses have been born, bred and raced in NY. Disagree all you want. Facts speak for themselves. "Actions speak louder than words" DTS |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I have to agree with DTS. I horse that can run and win is a horse that can run and win. It doesn't matter where they are from at all...it's just a location. Back in 2003, I would have taken Funny Cide over all 3 year old KY breds.
Are KY breds better overall than NY breds...well of course. But, that certainly wouldn't keep me from buying a nice NY bred who was fast and could win or breeding good NY horses. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
chief seattle is the only top 100 sire standing in NY and shillelagh slew has earned him everything racing in Canada. even Maryland has better stallions. Last edited by Revolution : 09-06-2006 at 08:29 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If your looking for a triple crown winner, well, we've been waiting a long time is all I can say. HOY might happen sooner than later. NY has done a lot to boost breeders. I agree with GR, it doesn't matter where it's born. Have a look: http://www.nybreds.com/frames/FS_incentives.html DTS |