Aqu 7th: why no refund on the #10?

[gales0678]

hossy or anyone else let's say there is no interference on the #10 , let's say sanchez just had a bad ride on the #1 , can you just eplain to me why the payouts came back so short on the ex, the tri , and p3 , explain it to me in conjunction with the 7th race from thursday , i am trying to learn here

[Bobby Fischer]

the horse sat down

[Bobby Fischer]

ex probables 3 AND
1.284
2.132
5.452
6.269
7.329
8.2524
9.757
10.460

so the 6 and 7 were 2nd and 4th choices for exactas under the 3. The trifecta pool was similar as well.

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer

ex probables 3 AND
1.284
2.132
5.452
6.269
7.329
8.2524
9.757
10.460

so the 6 and 7 were 3rd and 4th choices for exactas under the 3. The trifecta pool was similar as well.

so now the 10 who was 2nd choice in the race if i remeber correctly goes off 5th choice under the #3 here ???

[the_fat_man]

What I can't understand is how they got the 1 to agree to BOLT. I mean, it's clear that Sanchez is shitting his pants and bails because he doesn't want to go headfirst into the backstretch outer rail.

It was staged. A fix.

[Bobby Fischer]

Originally Posted by gales0678

so now the 10 who was 2nd choice in the race if i remeber correctly goes off 5th choice under the #3 here ???

6 was also 2nd choice in the show pool. Is he a closer?


with most of the field either the 6or 7 underneath paid better or extremely close to the 10. Sometimes when you have a heavy fav. it's just not the same as the exotic pools

[gales0678]

i got what he is saying the #3 was lower in the exotic pools that what he was in the win pool

and if you watch the race and don't think that a horse getting stuck in the gate , a horse ending up in the parking lot after blowing a routine turn and exotic payouts comng back short raise red flags then i guess red flags should never be raised

andy is great , he works hard as anyone in the game, he has knowledge of the game far greater than most, but the fact remains he is a NYRA employee and any opinion he gives on here (on a nyra issue)brings an inherent conflict of interest

[Handicappy]

Originally Posted by gales0678

i got what he is saying the #3 was lower in the exotic pools that what he was in the win pool

and if you watch the race and don't think that a horse getting stuck in the gate , a horse ending up in the parking lot after blowing a routine turn and exotic payouts comng back short raise red flags then i guess red flags should never be raised

andy is great , he works hard as anyone in the game, he has knowledge of the game far greater than most, but the fact remains he is a NYRA employee and any opinion he gives on here (on a nyra issue)brings an inherent conflict of interest

My gawd!!! The horse that blew the turn was already explained. The horse broke a rein. Ever try to steer a horse without a rein! Fact, I was there.

The 10 sat to take a load off his feet at the wrong time. There was a long inquiry that I assume included the horse that wanted to check out the cars by the training track as well as the horse who wanted to relax a bit.

Andy explained the betting payouts well.

But it isn't just Andy as your remark regarding the horse blowing a "routine turn" suggests. You just don't want to hear it.

I get it. Everyone here complaining didn't win and therefore someone must have cheated or is engaged in a cover-up.

Signed, Not an employee of NYRA.

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by gales0678

i got what he is saying the #3 was lower in the exotic pools that what he was in the win pool

and if you watch the race and don't think that a horse getting stuck in the gate , a horse ending up in the parking lot after blowing a routine turn and exotic payouts comng back short raise red flags then i guess red flags should never be raised

andy is great , he works hard as anyone in the game, he has knowledge of the game far greater than most, but the fact remains he is a NYRA employee and any opinion he gives on here (on a nyra issue)brings an inherent conflict of interest

yeah, this is completely different then saying he has no credibility