|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
01-13-2009, 04:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The bigger sex crime here, may be that of any police, detective or lawyer that must see the pictures. I certainly would insist on seeing the evidence
 .What justification is there for any adult to view these pics, as it would be a greater "crime" than any committed so far by a few naked kids looking at a few other naked kids Looks like here we need to define pornography a bit better 
|
|
#2
01-13-2009, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, some pretty amazing logic here. Looking at pictures of 14/15yo girls is wrong so let's pass them around among school officials, the police station, and then the courts. Then you have child pornography charges based largely to protect underage people from being exploited but now we are going to further exploit them and press charges against them for exploiting themselves.
|
|
#3
01-13-2009, 04:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think a good lawyer should go after whoever seized the phones and thought it was OK to go through the pictures. They are the real criminals for invasion of privicy and underage porn
__________________
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things.
|
|
#4
01-13-2009, 05:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
RIGHT ON
|
Hybrid Mode
