![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Looked at the 1 in Race 4 and it would have paid over $300 and both went off at the same odds of 15-1
__________________
"Everybody's honest, when they can afford to be." Benny Binion |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Parlay was $340 for $2, so yes $1 would have been $170. The pick three that was really low was the late pick 3 last Friday. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If he played a $2 Cold P3 10/9/6 then yeah..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Never heard of a parlay being figured out in that manner. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
He's on crack. The parlay is based soley on the price the winner paid in each leg, no matter if you singled a horse or used all in a leg. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Why does how much he out into the overall ticket make a difference?
I was always taught that to figure out the parlay, you take the price the winner paid in the first leg and roll it over into the 2nd race and then take that total and roll it over into the 3rd race. All based on a $2 mutual. In this case: Race 1 winner paid $3 for a $2 bet. Take that $3 and bet it on the winner of the next leg which paid $14, so $14 x 1.5 = $21. Take that $21 and bet it on the winner of the last leg, so $32.40 x 10.5 = $340.20 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Okay I see above, not sure that's right though. I doesn't matter. Just felt like it should've paid more. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 6th race
what am i missing w/ Gaskin Land (#8)? 3-1 favorite off his last 2 efforts, shipping in from the bullpen (charles town) i don't get it if i were to play the race $1 tri 1/5679/5679 gl all -bt- |