![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't really think it's that one for one-ish. The min. wage has been around for a loooong time now.Up until just a iddy biddy ago the country seems to have survived this poisoning effect on the economy.Really---if you read your tripe and the tripe supplied by others,the min. wage should have bankrupt us 20 years ago. Now I know the last min. wage increase has caused this financial crisis we now face----but I think it's just one a them things. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think it's those maximum wage earners that may be the ones to watch out for.
They are sneaky mothah fucl<ahs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
i don't have a problem with the min wage, i never said i did. but i do feel that one effect it has is that while those who work for min wage get a raise when it's increased, it does cost a couple of others their job so that those who remain can get the raise. i know this, as i said my daughter and a co-worker both were let go when the hike went into affect. what i think should be done is that each state should set a min wage, not the feds-and actually most states min wage level is higher than the federal wage. the main reason i feel this would be better is because a 'living wage' isn't the same from one area to another, or one state to another. matter of fact, the min wage=living wage thing is untrue. no way someone can survive on what min wage is in most areas. certainly not in most cities.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
...blow me. Really. =:> |