![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sure, 'roids were legal just about everywhere, but somehow I doubt the intention was to make them available so that they could be administered to perfectly healthy, robust horses on a regular, systematic basis. There's obviously no question at this point that they have been abused by many trainers for many years for the sole purpose of performance enhancement on the racetrack. Like I said before, we know that Curlie received an anabolic steroid last season (likely on a regular basis, in my opinion, because of the way he held up during a very long campaign, his very muscular physique - particularly at the BC, and his trainer's rep regarding drugs), but I have yet to see any kind of evidence that either of his two main rivals were treated with 'roids. In fact, I'd be quite surprised if Nafzger used them on SS, especially on any kind of regular basis. So, in my opinion, you simply can't say with certainty that Curlie was the best of his generation because his performances were pharmacologically-enhanced last year and SS's and HS's may not have been. As far as Curlie running "a hole in the wind" in some maiden contest, please, there have been countless good runners which have scored big in their maiden race. Also, you never answered the question I posed in the other post ... do you think Curlie's acceleration issues this season have anything to do with his being off the 'program'? Would he have beaten the G3-caliber Wanderin Boy by six or eight lengths instead of less than one length if he was back on a 'roid regimen? |