Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-29-2008, 04:58 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
nothing wrong with bulger. he'd have more trade value at that age than a running back-31 isn't exactly old for a QB. but regardless of his talent level, he won't do squat without an O-line to give him time in the pocket. he's one of the few bright spots on an otherwise horrid team. the decision to bench him is probably what cost that coach his job. you don't give a guy a contract like that and then hand him headphones. it was a bonehead move. but while they're firing, they need to look at the gm as well.
More trade value would be any trade value because a 31 year old running back has virtually zero.

Bulger is a decent QB. No doubt about it. But at 31 and being a few years away from his better seasons (regardless of blame) he would command a midround draft pick at best. No one is going to give up a high pick and then have to deal with his contract for a guy that was good but not great and has health questions.

The one with the trade value is Stephen Jackson. You could get a high draft pick and or player(s) for a stud like Jackson that is still in his prime.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.