Palin: Does anyone want to bet she doesnt do another interview outside of Fox?

[ninetoone]

6 degrees of Miss South Carolina...

[ArlJim78]

for anyone concerned with facts, (a very small group apparently) the person who orignally defined the Bush Doctrine weighs in.
Gibson had it wrong, and Palin was correct to request the context.

the Bush Doctrine has been redefined 4 times during his eight years.
Gibson did not give the correct current answer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...091202457.html

[dalakhani]

LOL. You use a link to an OP ED piece by none other than Krauthammer...and you want to question the TRUTH?

BAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA.

She doesnt have a clue and there are people that actually want to defend that which would make them well...clueless.

The least she could do is answer to the party line. She couldnt even do that. She wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan while McCain says NO.

Sorry...no spin today.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

The least she could do is answer to the party line. She couldnt even do that. She wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan while McCain says NO.

Sorry...no spin today.

in case you somehow missed it, the theme of the ticket is that they're mavericks, they make independent decisions and challenge the party line when appropriate.

speaking about no spin, she did not say she wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

in case you somehow missed it, the theme of the ticket is that they're mavericks, they make independent decisions and challenge the party line when appropriate.

speaking about no spin, she did not say she wants to go after terrorists in Pakistan.

I think we need to ad "deaf" to dumb and blind in your case.

"charlie" asked "cuda" if she would go into pakistan to chase after terrorists. She said she would. McCain said that we cant.

Do you want the quotes or the video?

i hear you with the maverick thing...but foreign policy is important. Its one thing to go against party line (although McCain has voted with Bush 90% of the time...and those are McCAINS own words) but this would be a new one if two people on THE SAME TICKET cant agree on foreign policy as pertains to national security.

Then again, its hard to even have an idea of what foreign policy is when you have only been overseas ONCE in your entire life like Mrs. Palin. Maybe on her next trip visiting Track (stupid ****ing name) she can listen to a book on the Bush Doctrine. Maybe someone can even give her one of those world maps where you can color in the countries.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

I think we need to ad "deaf" to dumb and blind in your case.

"charlie" asked "cuda" if she would go into pakistan to chase after terrorists. She said she would. McCain said that we cant.

Do you want the quotes or the video?

i hear you with the maverick thing...but foreign policy is important. Its one thing to go against party line (although McCain has voted with Bush 90% of the time...and those are McCAINS own words) but this would be a new one if two people on THE SAME TICKET cant agree on foreign policy as pertains to national security.

Then again, its hard to even have an idea of what foreign policy is when you have only been overseas ONCE in your entire life like Mrs. Palin. Maybe on her next trip visiting Track (stupid ****ing name) she can listen to a book on the Bush Doctrine. Maybe someone can even give her one of those world maps where you can color in the countries.

the washington post says don't blame palin for any confusion, they count seven bush doctrines. i wonder if bush can even describe the bush doctrine?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...ail/components

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

I think we need to ad "deaf" to dumb and blind in your case.

"charlie" asked "cuda" if she would go into pakistan to chase after terrorists. She said she would. McCain said that we cant.

Do you want the quotes or the video?

there is no quote from Palin saying she would go into Pakistan chasing terrorists. she had the sense to not be pinned down and define what action the US should or should not take. i think she said all options should be on the table.

on the contrary, it was none other than commander Obama himself who made the irresponsible statement last year the US should invade Pakistan.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

there is no quote from Palin saying she would go into Pakistan chasing terrorists. she had the sense to not be pinned down and define what action the US should or should not take. i think she said all options should be on the table.

on the contrary, it was none other than commander Obama himself who made the irresponsible statement last year the US should invade Pakistan.

Yeah, except that's not what he said.

And we should be concentrating on Pakistan, instead of this ridiculous crusade against nobody in Iraq.

[ateamstupid]

Ah yes, Charles Krauthammer, the man who once compared George W. Bush to John F. Kennedy.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Ah yes, Charles Krauthammer, the man who once compared George W. Bush to John F. Kennedy.

The idiot brings up the wikipedia snippet as validity but all it does is say EXACTLY what Gibson did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine



And there are fools that want this woman a heartbeat away from the presidency.

[ArlJim78]

as expected, irrational blather.

"BAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA."?

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

as expected, irrational blather.

"BAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA."?

As expected, idiotic spin.

[ateamstupid]

Jim, you've got to be shitting me with that avatar.