Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:41 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

they have an alternative to turf-without having the problem of losing much of a field, and losing betting money on top of it. of course they won't be as hesitant to pull a turf off if they have a viable back up plan.

but i think adding an AWT at belmont is a silly idea. but they never ask me, so it doesn't matter.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-31-2008, 09:22 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

When I saw the comment attributed to Pletcher in today's DRF, I actually thought that it made sense. Not because Belmont would have dirt/turf/Poly to race over, but rather because many prior conversations around synthetics in NY have focused on the Belmont training track. As it stands now, it is the sole place to train during the winter for the vast majority of the NY horse population. To replace the current training track with a synthetic surface would force all horsemen stabled at Belmont to train over the synthetic. If they adopted this idea (and I know it's a long ways away due to finances), horsemen would effectively have a year-long choice between conventional dirt or a sythetic track over which to train their horses. That would be a good thing.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.