Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-30-2008, 10:49 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Try since the course was put in ( in 1988 I believe ).
I was too lazy to look up the stats, so I made sure I was right. I am pretty sure you are as well.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-30-2008, 10:55 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

The course fell apart in the fall of 1995 when it was cold and very rainy and a few races came off the last days. That is the only time I believe it happened after I started following their races in 1994.

Hell, when Tribulation won the QE II it was during a driving snowstorm.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-31-2008, 06:51 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
That absolutely is true. I would guess more turf races were taken off since polytrack was installed than in the FIVE YEARS prior.
It certainly isn't a ridiculous statement, and I have no way to prove otherwise, so I'll take your word on it.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:09 AM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Really, it is pretty simple. In situations where people feel they are taking it off the turf just cause there is a synthetic to fallback on then just don't bet the race. You can bet if handle drops they'll stop doing it quick. If people keep betting them when they come off then it really isn't NYRA's problem.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-31-2008, 07:41 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

they have an alternative to turf-without having the problem of losing much of a field, and losing betting money on top of it. of course they won't be as hesitant to pull a turf off if they have a viable back up plan.

but i think adding an AWT at belmont is a silly idea. but they never ask me, so it doesn't matter.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-31-2008, 08:22 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

When I saw the comment attributed to Pletcher in today's DRF, I actually thought that it made sense. Not because Belmont would have dirt/turf/Poly to race over, but rather because many prior conversations around synthetics in NY have focused on the Belmont training track. As it stands now, it is the sole place to train during the winter for the vast majority of the NY horse population. To replace the current training track with a synthetic surface would force all horsemen stabled at Belmont to train over the synthetic. If they adopted this idea (and I know it's a long ways away due to finances), horsemen would effectively have a year-long choice between conventional dirt or a sythetic track over which to train their horses. That would be a good thing.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-01-2008, 06:33 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default Nickname

Will Belmont change from "Big Sandy" to "Big Rubberbandy"?

Seriously -- I hope the Triple Crown tracks never change.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.