Not Phone, First Samurai, etc

Originally Posted by Ironhorse

Why do you think its such a weak field in the Belmont? You have the second, third and fourth place horse from the Kentucky Derby. The first place horse from the Peter Pan. And several other nice horses. Seems kind of arrogant for a maiden winner, 2 weeks ago, to call this a weak field. Wide open yes, weak no.

Ironhorse,
By all means and ratings this is a very weak Belmont. WEAK!!!!!!!!! BC has never won a grade one, neither has Steppenwolfer, nor Jazil.
The basis you used for declaring this race to not be weak was that the "2nd,3rd, and 4th derby finishers" are in there. I respectfully say to you, big deal and who cares? Heck, Jazil and Wlf have NEVER won a stake!!! And BC has yet to win a grade one. No Derby or Preak winner, no exciting new shooters. This field is as wweak or weaker than the Belmont in 2000.

WEAK YES WIDE OPEN YES!!!!!!