![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As an example I'll use Franks picks from last night at Hollywood from the Scav vs. TVG thread in selections. Frank M 5: 1,2,6 6: 6,7,8 7: 3,4 8: 6,8 $ 36 For his $36 he has an option of playing the late DD 3,4/6,8 for $8 each combination. The double paid $36x4=$154 The late p3 paid $104 which he would have 3 times given a $36 investment. 3x$104=$312. The p-4 paid $430. Had he added the #5 in the 5th race to his combinations increasing the wager to $48 he would have cashed the p-4 for $430 but at the same time he would also have the p-3 once again bringing that total to $416 and the DD 2 more times totaling $226. In the race he missed the winner paid $10 and his choices were 3-2, 4-1 and 8-1.The question is was the risk worth the reward when only one of his choices in the 5th race would have yielded much more than $430 ? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think the large ticket is always a much better play. I have no problem wagering up to $200 on a pick 4 ticket. I hear people playing multiple tickets with a single on each ticket. I also like that idea. You spend about the same as you would on a single large ticket. I do not understand that thought process of capping your only pick 4 ticket at $40 or so (unless the pick 4 sequence dictates as such).
|