Thank you God

[SCUDSBROTHER]

"Scuds leave Ziggy alone you swine"


O.K.,thread done.
__________________

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

"Scuds leave Ziggy alone you swine"


O.K.,thread done.
__________________

taking your ball and going home?

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by BellamyRd.

taking your ball and going home?

O.K a$$........So,you want it to keep going.Fine.

it just seems a little immature to call someone a bitch
just because they disagree w/ you
and then declare "thread over" when someone else does
it's like you're a big titty baby
personally, I was glad to see G win the SD

[Pedigree Ann]

For first off a long layoff and at a distance less than his best, I think Giacomo's race looked pretty good. I thought he might not get the pace he needed to run past the front runners, but 6f in 1:09 and change set it up perfectly for him. He should move forward off of this effort, be fitter for his next race. If somebody goes with Lava Man the way Surf Cat did last year, Giacomo could pull a Borrego in the Pacific Classic.

I, too, thought it was too bad that Papi Chullo was DQ'ed, because the horse that he bothered (Rathor) was backing up at the time and wouldn't have hit the board in any case. Another one of those overhyped NY allowance winners. (Ring any bells?) No question that PC DID bother him, I noticed it at the time, but still a pity he had to come down.

Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann

For first off a long layoff and at a distance less than his best, I think Giacomo's race looked pretty good. I thought he might not get the pace he needed to run past the front runners, but 6f in 1:09 and change set it up perfectly for him. He should move forward off of this effort, be fitter for his next race. If somebody goes with Lava Man the way Surf Cat did last year, Giacomo could pull a Borrego in the Pacific Classic.

I, too, thought it was too bad that Papi Chullo was DQ'ed, because the horse that he bothered (Rathor) was backing up at the time and wouldn't have hit the board in any case. Another one of those overhyped NY allowance winners. (Ring any bells?) No question that PC DID bother him, I noticed it at the time, but still a pity he had to come down.

Isn't Giacomo from the ultra-prolific, all-conquering Sir Gallahad line?

Please tell us ... oh great pedigree genius ... about all the champions the Sir Gallahad line has produced ... especially during its Golden Age ... from 1945-1955.

We're all tingling with excitement awaiting your response.

[pdrift1]

Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann

For first off a long layoff and at a distance less than his best, I think Giacomo's race looked pretty good. I thought he might not get the pace he needed to run past the front runners, but 6f in 1:09 and change set it up perfectly for him. He should move forward off of this effort, be fitter for his next race. If somebody goes with Lava Man the way Surf Cat did last year, Giacomo could pull a Borrego in the Pacific Classic.

I, too, thought it was too bad that Papi Chullo was DQ'ed, because the horse that he bothered (Rathor) was backing up at the time and wouldn't have hit the board in any case. Another one of those overhyped NY allowance winners. (Ring any bells?) No question that PC DID bother him, I noticed it at the time, but still a pity he had to come down.

yeah and that borrego ,ann ,is going to be perfect drift!!!!!!!!!if there is a honest pace in this race against lava man, he gets beat

[Independent George]

I dont understand why a person can't state a differing opinion on a horse's performance and not get attacked for it.This is a Forum of Opinions...is it not?? Having read his analysis of the race, I don't think he was being unfairly negative. Let's face it, Giacamo didn't go off at box-car odds in the Derby because his pp's were so outstanding.He ran the race of his life and hasn't been a world-beater since.He is not the kind of horse that inspires superlatives. It was a nice race; he won,,,good. But the original poster was more interested in using his victory as some kind of catharsis and reason to berate anyone who didn't think Giacamo was the Second Coming. You start a post that way, about a horse that has had more failures than victories and you set yourself up for others to offer you a reality check.

Originally Posted by Independent George

I dont understand why a person can't state a differing opinion on a horse's performance and not get attacked for it.This is a Forum of Opinions...is it not?? Having read his analysis of the race, I don't think he was being unfairly negative. Let's face it, Giacamo didn't go off at box-car odds in the Derby because his pp's were so outstanding.He ran the race of his life and hasn't been a world-beater since.He is not the kind of horse that inspires superlatives. It was a nice race; he won,,,good. But the original poster was more interested in using his victory as some kind of catharsis and reason to berate anyone who didn't think Giacamo was the Second Coming. You start a post that way, about a horse that has had more failures than victories and you set yourself up for others to offer you a reality check.

Here's the way it works, George ...

... any horse they like who wins a race ... no matter when and where the race is run ... must be called "impressive" ... and anyone who says the horse may not have been "impressive" ... is a loser ... a fool ... an idiot ... unless ...

... unless it's a horse they don't like ... then you can't say the horse was "impressive" ... because then you're ... guess what? ... right, you guessed it ... a loser ... a fool ... and an idiot.

You can't win, my friend ... somtimes you just can't win.

Originally Posted by Independent George

I dont understand why a person can't state a differing opinion on a horse's performance and not get attacked for it.This is a Forum of Opinions...is it not?? Having read his analysis of the race, I don't think he was being unfairly negative. Let's face it, Giacamo didn't go off at box-car odds in the Derby because his pp's were so outstanding.He ran the race of his life and hasn't been a world-beater since.He is not the kind of horse that inspires superlatives. It was a nice race; he won,,,good. But the original poster was more interested in using his victory as some kind of catharsis and reason to berate anyone who didn't think Giacamo was the Second Coming. You start a post that way, about a horse that has had more failures than victories and you set yourself up for others to offer you a reality check.

People all have different personalities. That is life.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by BellamyRd.

it just seems a little immature to call someone a bitch
just because they disagree w/ you
and then declare "thread over" when someone else does
it's like you're a big titty baby
personally, I was glad to see G win the SD

I said I was walking away,but you weren't happy about that.So,let it continue.It's ugly,but too bad.They have kicked this Derby winner around enough,and I ain't gunna sit back and take their crap one day longer.

[Scurlogue Champ]

I enjoy calling people b itches, especially if they are men.

Even better is c u n t, now that is my favorite.

Although, Scuds is kind of acting like a b itch right now for not letting it go.

Why wouldn't you just tell Danzig to eff off and let it go?

It must be those liberal left-coast ways.....

[Independent George]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I said I was walking away,but you weren't happy about that.So,let it continue.It's ugly,but too bad.They have kicked this Derby winner around enough,and I ain't gunna sit back and take their crap one day longer.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Originally Posted by Independent George

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

You left out two A's.