Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Breeders' Cup Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2007, 10:14 PM
Uncle Daddy's Avatar
Uncle Daddy Uncle Daddy is offline
Cahokia Downs
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oakland County Michigan
Posts: 150
Default

The weather in NJ made me think of 2002 at Arlington and all the whining and complaining about the cold. I would move that day up based upon conditions and fields we just saw. I think it was better attended, the turf was superb and you got a few prices on the day ( Valponi!)
__________________
Do it big, do it right and do it with style!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2007, 10:17 PM
ELA ELA is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 1,293
Default

Moving BC day, cancelling and going the next day, etc. -- while desirable -- it is just extremely difficult and not very feasible.

Sure, if conditions were truly dangerous, there would be no questions.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2007, 06:41 AM
Bigsmc's Avatar
Bigsmc Bigsmc is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
I preferred last Saturday's weather to last Sunday's weather, without question. I know that it rained early in the day -- I was there, and I drove to central New Jersey very early Saturday morning through a monsoon -- but after the rain ended, it was pleasant. I'd take light rain and 68 degrees to Belmont's 2005 weather every time, even though my seats were not under cover.

Sunday was bright, clear, and with the whipping wind, rather cold. It would have been parka weather last Sunday at Monmouth. I was there on Saturday in shorts.
LOL. A fine example of where you and I are from. You were in shorts and I had three layers on. I took it down to two layers when the sun came out.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 AM
Metal Man Metal Man is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So.California
Posts: 50
Default

The 10 cent superfecta hurt the larger payoffs in those pools.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2007, 09:05 AM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metal Man
The 10 cent superfecta hurt the larger payoffs in those pools.
I see no evidence for that. The results were on the predictable side which is why there were no really large payouts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2007, 09:52 AM
hockey2315 hockey2315 is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metal Man
The 10 cent superfecta hurt the larger payoffs in those pools.
This is a trendy opinion but I agree with Jim that there's no evidence for it. . .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:10 AM
Metal Man Metal Man is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So.California
Posts: 50
Default

OK your right and I'm wrong, but I saw alot of gezzers playing and cashing $2.40 tickets. I know they were not going to play $24 to catch the same winner.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:18 AM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metal Man
OK your right and I'm wrong, but I saw alot of gezzers playing and cashing $2.40 tickets. I know they were not going to play $24 to catch the same winner.
do you also think all the geezers playing $2 to win hurt the win payoffs?

The super pool for the classic was over $2.5 million and paid out over 2000 to 1. Anyone that had it for a dime and collected $214 should be thrilled.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.