|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-24-2007, 07:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Now ...this is not a putdown nor wise guy remark..it really isn't.
I'm just kind of disappointed I go to a man of physics to get some interesting fill in on the latest theories consistng of really great "out there" stuff.........................and I get........phooey on it???? I mean that's about the size of what you said....right? No wonder horseracing was invented. 
|
|
#2
10-24-2007, 12:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
But I do think GhostHunters could debunk most of this stuff.
They're kind of self debunking to begin with. So do you believe in ghosts? Does theoretical physics ever delve into that area? Serious question...you would think they would have.
|
|
#3
10-24-2007, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If a ghost is what many present in movies and books then heck no I do not personally believe ghosts exist. But I cant prove anything. And no theoretical Physics geek of any stature would never delve into this kind of stuff without having a working definition of what the heck a ghost is. But I do believe 30 species of beetles have ghosts. Really... Ghosts and souls etc... are beyond the realm of science as there is no way to disprove or prove something as undefined as these things. If you come up with a working definition, and you figure out an experiment that can pick up this... energy??? or prove that the energy or ectoplasm or what ever the heck these things are do not exist, please PM me.
|
|
#5
10-24-2007, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Peegarden you idiot. Everyone knows what ghosts are. Ghosts are... and proceed to tell me what ghosts are.
|
|
#7
10-24-2007, 04:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
the nature of Science would have a problems with what I have stated. They might chastize me for not understanding the math better that might help me have the appropriate models. But then again all I have to mention is Godel, and they realize that they stand on very shaky ground. But it is still fun for them. They would however kick your behind about the beginning of the universe as we have very good evidence on the timing and events that most likely took place. They would be much more comfortable with the big bang than parallel universes, super string theory, worm holes, etc... All neat sounding little models. I also have a problem with many Physicists as they have very little training in the History of Life on earth. If they really understood the complete randomness of vertebrates let alone human beings ever happening they would not be so smug about insisting there is intelligent life somewhere else. See Steven J. Gould, Wonderful Life. The last few chapters set Physics types on their heels. It should be required reading for anyone interested in the real history of life and the randomness of ever producing anything close to a human or even anything that we might consider intelligent. Religious types conclude this book proves humans are extra special. But they dont like the conclusion of random events playing any role. They must have a guiding force. It is really hard to discuss this idea unless one reads the book. The first chapters are not necessary, the last two or three are very convincing. Sorry I am unable to play games with parallel universes or quantum theory. My math is not good enough to get a realistic grip. I dont like models without some shred of convincing modes to really be able to analyze it. Im just not smart enough.
|
Hybrid Mode
