|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-04-2007, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Most defenses are predicated on speed and blitzes. Ohio state is not going to sit back in a zone and wait for painter to make his mistake. They are going to blitz and blitz often. Blitzing against a QB and Wr's who are quite familiar with each other is setting yourself up to beat deep. Giving up 7 at home to a team that can score is always a dangerous idea. I think a bettor can find better value for their money this game.
Morty, As much as would like to think I am nosy, It's just not the case. I think the red sox will win the world series.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus 
|
|
#2
10-04-2007, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am in fact part of that family, My mother was Shirly my father was Bob, or as you may know them, creamy and crunchy.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
|
|
#4
10-04-2007, 01:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Morty, the diffrence is Washington had a frosh at qb. Granted, he has some physical talents but still young none the less. Very difficult going from high school football to playing a top big ten team(that does not mean much this year) I already stated that ohio state is a better team. But purdues offense can score in bunches. If ohio state plays man to man for more then 50% of the game purdue, will win. For OSU to win they need to be able to help deep with their safeties and allow their line and backers to control the run and get pressure on painter. If that happens, Painter will force throws and OSU will be fine.
Thank you for the accolades on the baseball pick. That conclusion of course was the result of many man hours of work.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
|
|
#5
10-04-2007, 01:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
God you're really pissing me off. You also COMPLETELY forget the fact Purdue has a poopie defense and Ohio State will control the ball on these goofy guys. They will get behind early and panic. Ohios defense will eat them alive...anyway they want to. No problem on the compliment...anytime.
|
|
#7
10-04-2007, 02:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why do you think they have been dominant. They have played exactly one team in the top 90 and that was washington. Not exactly offensive juggarnauts there. Have you actually seen a purdue game this season. The first halfs of all the games have been great. Then the fat defense gets lazy and everyone throws up td's in the second half. I think its going to be a good game. Its a battle of two untesteds. Purdues offense has run over weak competition and ohio states defense has run over weak competition.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
|
|
#8
10-04-2007, 02:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
May I remind you....you massive mountebank...you.....that Washington barely escaped victory against USC? Essentially you are saying good offense is going to beat very good defense. Are you insane!!!?
|
|
#9
10-04-2007, 01:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Gee..I didn't know you had developed the def. game plan for Ohio State. They will see plenty of mixed zone and man to man....there is a lot of speed on this defense...they will most likely force Purdue to play their puny little nickle dime pass game....and then when they least expect it.... ...SPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!! They shall strike like the viper. Oh yes.....just like the Washington game....we were giving 4 I think to a team that could score at home.....and won by 19. Purdue could only beat the Noddles 33-19....abyssmal. You have strange fb thoughts...but I agree on the Red Soz...fine work.
|
Hybrid Mode
