|
|
 |
|
#3
09-13-2007, 11:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
The issue isn't whether he's owed $6.5 million. I'm sure they'll prove he's not. But the implication is that he's owed something because he claims that the machine retained some tickets before issuing the voucher (he apparently doesn't know, conveniently, what bets he actually won because he fed a bunch of tickets into the machine to check them). So now the question is how much they will pay to make this go away.
__________________
Ticket Seller: All kind of balls... Bodyguard: One of his is crystal. 
|
Threaded Mode