![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nothing whatsover will happen.
Thoroughbred race horses have been breaking down ever since Flying Childers was a weanling. Everyone in the general public with a modicum of intelligence understands that race horses are fragile creatures ... just take a look at those big powerful bodies and pencil-thin legs. There's always a desire to be part of something historic ... but this ain't it. If you want to be a part of history ... take a look at what's happening between muslim fanatics and the civilized world. Barbaro's life or death ... while of particular interest to those of us who populate this forum ... just isn't that important to the rest of the world. It'll be a one-day story ... then it'll be gone. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Watch out DerbyTrail people. This guy will show his true colors on Barbaro soon enough. He's an insensitive *******. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
He lives in a cardboard box beside 1-95. Goes to his local library so he can go to his rightwing propaganda sites, then come here to annoy racing fans. No knowledge of racing, horses or, actually, anything relevant. Totally an attention seeker. Babble, babble, babble....in one ear, out the other. Back to your cardboard box Bold B. Even others are on to you, and frankly, you are getting a bit tiring. Did you get you bottle deposits yet so you can play at your OTB? Last edited by Downthestretch55 : 07-14-2006 at 03:09 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
... that those are the only people who ask you about horse racing? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Understandable though ... things are really dreadful over there without me. 'Tis a pity. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() True dahoss. bold brooklynite is not bold. this poster is behind the times, sits on his ass, and makes excuses for the staus quo.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Ruffian and Go For Wand also happened on national TV ... to much bigger audiences ... and they had zero short-term and long-term impact. The Barbaro story? It'll be debated here forever. To the general public ... it'll be fifteen minutes ... and out. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Ruffian's death was immediately followed by the astounding exploits of Forego, Seattle Slew, Affirmed/Alydar, and Spectacular Bid. The late 1970's were the Glory Days for thoroughbred racing. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() if there is no connection between his breaking thru the gate and than his injury, why the need to be checked more thoroughly? how thoroughly? if they followed standard practice, why is there still something wrong with what they did? i'm sorry if you think i'm hounding you, but i just don't get the whole thing.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If the track vet and starter crew had spent more than 30 seconds ... say 60 seconds ... examining Barbaro ... maybe these nutcase redboarders would have less to say ... maybe. The vet did a normal examination ... but Cajun is saying because of the high visibility of the situation ... maybe the exam could have been extra-normal ... just to vitiate post-race conspiracy theories. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() but you can't judge what happened THEN (the gate and subsequent check out by the vet) by what we know happened after. it's a shame that some will go back and point at that incident as the pivotal moment. esp since it isn't.
and yes, much like pearl harbor 'historians' who say by using all the info collected AFTER the bombing, and knowing the japanese did indeed bomb us and destroy much of our fleet, and by using tremendous HIND sight that we 'SHOULD HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG' there will be those who say that the gate crew/pimlico/magna rushed the job....but they'll still be incorrect.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jumping in late.....
Yes, this may be 15 minutes and out. That doesn't mean everything in the long term, though. Ruffian was 15 minutes and out, too. But not among those who paid attention and cared. And she's come back in notice, stronger than ever. It just took awhile. I would suspect most all here are closet animal and horse lovers, whether they would admit it, or not. Even the pure "action" crowd, of which I am occasionally one. I'm not a card carrying PETA member, but I sure as heck want good treatment of all animals whenever possible. Thoroughbreds love to run. I've seen them perk up in the paddock when some get the late realization jolt of the job they've got to do....and want to do. And, I've seen 'em prance and dance after a race with a "look at me" attitude.... looking into the stretch trackside fans after a 6th place finish. All that said, I still hold the starter and Pimlico and maybe the television network liable for the decision to put Barbaro back in the gate so quickly after he broke through. I won't let that one die. Last edited by westcoastinvader : 07-14-2006 at 02:17 AM. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The great champion Sword Dancer broke through the gate three times in his career ... and went on to win all three of those races ... and retired perfectly sound after 39 starts. Unless a horse is actually injured in the process ... breaking through the gate means absolutely nothing. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/cajungator26 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite World War III has started... and I think that'll get a lot more coverage. Ruffian and Go For Wand also happened on national TV ... to much bigger audiences ... and they had zero short-term and long-term impact. The Barbaro story? It'll be debated here forever. To the general public ... it'll be fifteen minutes ... and out. Quote:
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i doubt sumitas wants to get into any debate here, as that would involve the sharing of ideas...and he's only interested in his own here.
barbaro took a bad step, change of surface would have made no difference in that regard. as for taking a blow, i don't think it will be as bad as it would have been if they had put him down right there on the track, or that night. everyone knows that everything was done that could be--but in the end it was up to whether he developed exactly what he did end up with--laminitis. what will irritate me more than anything?? the second guessers who say that nothing should have been attempted to begin with, those who say the horse shouldn't have been 'put thru all this'....that kind makes me sick. they'd have been the first to criticize had the jacksons et al not made the attempt!! we all knew barbaro was up against it. richardson said 50-50 from the get go, and never backed off of that. we were all hopeful when he came out so well initially, but anyone who knows anything about horses knew what he was up against.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |