![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And I feel your pain on the P4 thing, I've asked NYRA to add a P3 starting in that leg because the last leg is usually some bad NYB maidens or something crappy and they said "it would cannibalize the P4 pool" (of course, you can start a P3 OR P4 in the 2nd race every day...)
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Arlington's a good example of it this year.... they added a pick 6 this year.... and due to that they switched the mid-day double from race 5 to race 4, so that they don't start the same race. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The ticket I played on Sunday, the late pick four
3,10 5,7,8 1,3 1,10 I played that 3 times so a total of $72. If there was a pick three, I would have played that instead so the total would have been $12 per $1. The win parlay would have been structured as. 3,10 5,7,8 1,3 So a total cost of $12 Winners paid: 10 = $9 8 = $16.80 3 = $2.70 What would I have gotten back on that $1 win parlay? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
10= 4.50 8 = 8.40 (7.40-1) 3 = 1.35 (.35-1) $1 to win on 10-leg A gets you $4.50 $4.50 to win on 8 in leg B gets you $37.80 ((4.50 x 7.4)+4.50 $37.80 to win on 3 in leg C gets you $51.03 ((37.80 x .35)+37.80 I guess. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You would have bet $6 on each horse in the first race. You would have cashed $27 on the winner. This would have left you $9 on each horse in the second leg. you would have cashed $75.60 on the winner. This would have left you $37.80 on each horse in the last leg, leaving a final tally of $51.03 after the third leg. $12 investment = $51 return. This would vary a bit since you couldn't make $.50 wagers but the math for the parlay is accurate. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|