![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm perfectly fine with your assessment that hate crimes shouldn't exist at all. That's a valid argument, and one that I have no problem supporting. Getting rid of them wholly is one thing, but if we're going to keep them and let certain groups have them (religion, races) but not a group that makes up ~16% of all hate crimes, something is very wrong. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If gays kept being gay to themselves they wouldnt get attacked.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ySSg4QG8g |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The bill covers gays and non-gays alike. If someone attacks you (not gay) because they think you are gay (even though you aren't) and they carve the word F-A-G in your stomach, that's still a hate crime. If that were to happen, I'm sure there'd be lines of people standing around saying "If he would have just kept his gayness to himself this wouldn't have happened." That, by the way, is the same awful logic that says that if women would just wear pants and sweatshirts, they wouldn't get raped -- that it's their fault. Foolish. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Brian
Whats wrong with a standard assult charge? Why does someones sexual orientation have to come into play at all.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ySSg4QG8g |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
All you've argued so far is that gays are icky, should never leave the house with their partner, and that if they get killed they deserved it anyway, if I may sum up all your posts with one cogent sentence. If hate crime laws exist, and they do, then homosexuality should very well be covered. What's wrong with a standard assault charge against a person who kills a Muslim (or someone he or she even thinks is a Muslim) in the street while shouting anti-Muslim racist filth at them? Laws are in place to protect those groups right now, because an attack like that would terrorize the entire Muslim community and not just the victim. If you've never been a part of a group that has been terrorized by a crime like that, you can't understand -- and that's fine, I wish that were the case with me. I think you're lucky if that's never happened to you. The only real argument that can be made against this bill is that all hate crime laws should be eliminated -- in which case, it's time for everyone who opposed this bill to start calling their Congresspeople to make sure that they get right on that. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Gays shouldnt be entitled to any special rights, or laws. They should keep their sexual orientation to themselves and there would be a lot less beatings.
I never said gays are icky, I dont want homosexuality forced down my throat. If I wanted to see gay men touch each other Ill go to a Chip N Dale show. Yes, all hate crimes should be eliminated, and they should elimiate affirmative action while they are at it.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ySSg4QG8g |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hate crimes based on sexuality happen all the time. When I lived in Tucson, this gay man was beat to death a block from where I lived. Hit in the head like 60 times with a baseball bat for no other reason than he was gay. My ex-gf was beat up by a bunch of frat boys when she was on her was to see me just cause she "looked like a d***". These acts of violence effect the entire community, and terrorize the "gay" community.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion of homosexuality, but why wouldnt you want people who are targeted for violence to be protected. |