![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Does this race ever have more than five horses?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I look for Master Command to win this. I think the horse has really developed into a nice older horse.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
NICE PICK ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Is this the first time a Graded Stake race at Hawthorne was ever carded as Race #4?
At least the Sixty Sails managed to attract a field of five.....with a 115lbs highweight. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What would "graded stakes placed versus males" do for the value of a female? If I had a decent one, I'd take a shot in here.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It would be a much more interesting race if the 2 and 3 scratched
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() you might be able to make some money here actually.
Lets say you start with $300 and put it to win on SNS, who I consider a much better horse then Master Command. I think the ML has MC right as Chicago Pletcher steam will have him 3/5 or 4/5. You will probably get 6/5 on SNS. SNS wins and you get back $660. You take that $660 and put $300 WP on Rolling Sea, who is a MORTAL LOCK in that race. MORTAL. Pletcher filly is along for the ride and while quite possibly lone speed, I am guessing that ET on the far outside will get trigger happy like he always does. 3/1 is ludicrous on this horse as the Illinois faithful will pound her so I am guessing more like 2/1, possibly favored. You also play Rolling Sea singled in the end on a $10 pick three ticket starting in race 6 6: 4,5,6 7: 3,8 (8 is a lock here also but just in case (Hazelton horses always get a race and then lock and load 2nd out, especially with 3 year old MSW's, he is lethal with 2 year old First MSW)) 8: 3 So it looks like this $300 SNS = $660 back $10 Pick 3 $300 WP Rolling Sea = $1100 + whatever the pick three is paying times 10 All is pre-TG's, but I know Rolling Sea's sheet well along with SNS and both will be solid plays IMO. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
@BDiDonatoTDN |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I can't think of who the other horse is though...maybe I'm just making that sixth horse up. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
he ran fourth |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I keyed him in second with ALL on both sides of him. Then stupid Summer Book edged him out late for the place. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/cajungator26 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Such a joke, I was going to unload on a DD but I can't even do that because they can't put them next to each other. Can't wait until Arlington just buys them and takes Illinois completely over. Would be so much better.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I try to stick up for Midwestern racing but this is downright embarrassing. They get 2 horses and all they can dig up is an over the hill Courthouse and a Bruggemann move-up job.
BTW, if you don't know who Bruggemann is, he's becoming one of the top move-up artists in the Midwest. But even he can't move Le Jester up enough to contend here. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It is sad, to be sure. I'm the world's biggest Courthouse apologist, but the fact that he's going to pick up at least a 4th place check in a GIII race given his current form is appalling. At least last year he came into the race better than this year. I guess the connections are afraid to lose him, because he's more than fast enough to contend in higher priced claiming races, yet they keep throwing him in against optional claimers. I don't see how his picking up checks for running 4th or so in races like that benefits them more than dropping him in for a decent tag and letting him be put up for sale with a chance to take the lion's share of the purse. Oh wait, I do see it. They can keep him and run him in guaranteed check spots in GIII races. Nevermind. |