You concluded that the horse that lost was better than the horse that won. Obviously you are going by something other than that one loss.
So yes, elaborate. How do you come to that conclusion?
I don't think he can. Is there any criteria to examine which wolud logically lead to the conclusion that Bernardini was better? There may be....but I can't think of any.
04-01-2007, 07:49 PM
Threaded Mode