![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What are you thinking? Are you thinking that the 6 post is somehow vastly underbet by the majority of bettors? Why in the world would you think that? The results you "simulated" were thrown off by the couple of longshots that happened to be included in that particular sample. In the longrun, you will lose at about the track take if you always bet the #6 horse. So everytime you put down your $100/day, you can expect to hang onto about $84 of it. If you bet it at Pinnacle, the rebate will bring you back up to $91 of it. --Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
This sounds like my greyhound strategy... K, gotta throw the 8 dog in those boxes with the puppies. You are right that the middle dogs tend to have a lot of traffic issues, but the 8 wins the second most races behind the 1.
From the dumb bet department...after Giacomo last year, we figured that an ALL/ALL exacta box would have won money in three of five Derbies since they went to the 20 horse mutuel field. with a very nice overall profit due to some monster scores...also worked well in the Belmont with Sarava, Commendable, Lemon Drop Kid.
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |