Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-15-2007, 07:33 AM
JJP JJP is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,220
Default

To answer the original question, I think a good analogy would be the NCAA tourney selection. Its subjective, and fraught with mistakes. There's no reason a race like the Arkansas Derby, after spawning the likes of Smarty Jones, Borrego, Purge, Afleet Alex and the horse who won the 2005 Travers (name escapes me) should've stayed a Grade 2. Meanwhile, a race like the Prioress, which should be fortunate to be a Grade 3 after three miserable renewals, remains a Grade 1. Come to think of it, is there any reason to have any Grade 1 sprints for 3YO fillies? The Test was dreadful as well. The runnerup in the race this past year was coming off an off the board finish against Illinois bred fillies.....and she almost won the Test.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-15-2007, 07:58 AM
Linny's Avatar
Linny Linny is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 2,104
Default

One or two poor runnings shouldn't require a downgrade but 3 or 4 should. The Committee (which I think is nuts) supposedly meets annually to re-assess the grading. Some of the decisions are inane. I still cannot understand why the Keeneland Mile is G1 and the Oak Tree Mile is G2. In late 2004 they met and upgraded the Clark H to G1. It was run in 2005 as a G1 and by the end of the year, it was a G2 again. If they supposedly use 3 or 4 year averages, then how can a race's grade change twice in consecutive years?

There is a push now, esp. with the arrival of a BC race for female sprinters to have a "G1/2/3" season of races for filly sprinters and it makes sense. In some seasons the Prioress and the Test are outstanding. Does the carson Hollow/You race ring a bell?
In the rush to push new races into the fray, like the American Oaks other historic events are often short sold. The Sunshine Millions has diminished the quality of G1 races like the Santa Monica and the San Antonio, even the Donn. The new BC races will create a push to "make divisions" which include G1's leading up to a championship race.
Where I think the grading system is wrong is this. A G1 should be a G1, they should all be equal. Is the Gulfstream Park Turf H. (G1) as important as the Arlington Million (G1) and/or the Breeders' Cup Turf(G1)? Is the Las Virgenes or the Acorn as important as the Ky Oaks and/or the Alabama? They are all G1 so in theory they are. If the Ky Derby and the Travers and the Pacific Classic and the Breeders' Cup Classic are G1 then all other G1 races should be just as important, if not they are really G2.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-15-2007, 02:40 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

i don't think the graded stakes committee can explain it.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.