Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2007, 02:52 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis
Don't see him winning here, I'd like to see a little more distance for him against this pace...although he broke his maiden over the same track at the same distance. That said, I like him keyed under the 1,2,3,6 - if it's even worth betting.
Taake the Bluff wins it - Jazil 2nd and one of the coupled entries was third.

Impossible to really see anything for the fog. looks like Jara started him a bit late but he really didn't show the closing speed you would have expected.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2007, 02:54 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis
Taake the Bluff wins it - Jazil 2nd and one of the coupled entries was third.

Impossible to really see anything for the fog. looks like Jara started him a bit late but he really didn't show the closing speed you would have expected.
He's never really been a closer, he just runs the same speed all race so passes tiring horses at the end. Looks like he isn't any faster that he'll be a factor at 8.5 to 9 furlongs. Time to start building a campaign around the 9.5 to 10 furlong stakes. Can't believe he went at less than even money here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:13 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
He's never really been a closer, he just runs the same speed all race so passes tiring horses at the end.
That is a closer.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:14 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
That is a closer.
I consider a closer a horse that sits back and turns it on at the end. He doesn't do that, he runs the same pace the whole way. I'd consider him a plodder which sounds insulting but he's at least a very good plodder.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:16 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

He is the Giacomo of the East Coast. But I would bet on Giacomo before Jazil.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:16 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
I consider a closer a horse that sits back and turns it on at the end.
Good luck finding one of those on dirt.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:18 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Good luck finding one of those on dirt.
Sun King
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:05 PM
Slewstoo's Avatar
Slewstoo Slewstoo is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
Sun King
I didn't know you were such a Sun King fan Sightseek
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:23 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Good luck finding one of those on dirt.
There are plenty of horses like that. Horses that have the speed to compete at shorter distances because they vary their speed early from race to race and come late with one big burst. Afleet Alex was like that, able to win stakes at 6 and 12 furlongs. Even Steppenwolfer has a burst of speed at the end even if it hasn't been helping him get in the winner's circle. Jazil just runs the same speed the whole way, that doesn't get it done at shorter distances. If you look at the fractions today Jara screwed up and rode the horse like he was a closer rather than a plodder. He kept him far off the pace when it went through in almost 24, 48, and 1:12. Jazil could have been close to that pace and still kept his 24- 25 clip through the finish line. Once he is way behind a 1:12 he doesn't have that closing kick to go win the race. Jara gave the horse no chance.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-06-2007, 02:02 AM
ManilaRose's Avatar
ManilaRose ManilaRose is offline
Bowie
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
There are plenty of horses like that. Horses that have the speed to compete at shorter distances because they vary their speed early from race to race and come late with one big burst. Afleet Alex was like that, able to win stakes at 6 and 12 furlongs. Even Steppenwolfer has a burst of speed at the end even if it hasn't been helping him get in the winner's circle. Jazil just runs the same speed the whole way, that doesn't get it done at shorter distances. If you look at the fractions today Jara screwed up and rode the horse like he was a closer rather than a plodder. He kept him far off the pace when it went through in almost 24, 48, and 1:12. Jazil could have been close to that pace and still kept his 24- 25 clip through the finish line. Once he is way behind a 1:12 he doesn't have that closing kick to go win the race. Jara gave the horse no chance.
I'm not on the Jara bandwagon but nobody would've won on him today. You won't ever see him close to the pace because the horse has no early speed at all. Second and most importantly, he was visibly tired at the end and being closer to the pace certainly wouldn't have helped him finish any stronger. How good is he? I don't know, but he should certainly improve off the start as it appears he needed the race and got something out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:25 PM
Buffymommy's Avatar
Buffymommy Buffymommy is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In a little world all my own...
Posts: 3,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Good luck finding one of those on dirt.

No horse that I have seen in my lifetime had a good of a closing kick as Victory Gallop.

Concern was a close second
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawaken.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:29 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffymommy
No horse that I have seen in my lifetime had a good of a closing kick as Victory Gallop.

Concern was a close second
You must not have seen Silky Sullivan.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-05-2007, 04:05 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
He's never really been a closer, he just runs the same speed all race so passes tiring horses at the end. Looks like he isn't any faster that he'll be a factor at 8.5 to 9 furlongs. Time to start building a campaign around the 9.5 to 10 furlong stakes. Can't believe he went at less than even money here.
That is the definition of a closer. Think about this:

You have a 6F sprint, with two main contenders; a deep closer and a frontrunner.
The frontrunner goes :22, :46, 1:12 and wins by a neck.
The closer is 7 lengths at the first call, 4 at the 2nd call, and loses by the neck.
What fractions did the front runner run? :22, :24, :26.
What fractions did the closer run? approximately :23 1/5, :23 2/5, :25 2/5.

Nearly all horses decelerate on the dirt, very few can and do accelerate at the end of the race. It's an optical illusion that the "closers" are actually running faster at the end than they did at the beginning... they're just decelerating at a lesser rate.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:16 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
That is the definition of a closer. Think about this:

You have a 6F sprint, with two main contenders; a deep closer and a frontrunner.
The frontrunner goes :22, :46, 1:12 and wins by a neck.
The closer is 7 lengths at the first call, 4 at the 2nd call, and loses by the neck.
What fractions did the front runner run? :22, :24, :26.
What fractions did the closer run? approximately :23 1/5, :23 2/5, :25 2/5.

Nearly all horses decelerate on the dirt, very few can and do accelerate at the end of the race. It's an optical illusion that the "closers" are actually running faster at the end than they did at the beginning... they're just decelerating at a lesser rate.
Than how do you differentiate a "plodder"?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-05-2007, 08:04 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
Than how do you differentiate a "plodder"?
Jazil :P

Just kidding. A plodder is a closer who never wins!
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-05-2007, 08:15 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
Jazil :P

Just kidding. A plodder is a closer who never wins!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-05-2007, 09:07 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
That is the definition of a closer. Think about this:

You have a 6F sprint, with two main contenders; a deep closer and a frontrunner.
The frontrunner goes :22, :46, 1:12 and wins by a neck.
The closer is 7 lengths at the first call, 4 at the 2nd call, and loses by the neck.
What fractions did the front runner run? :22, :24, :26.
What fractions did the closer run? approximately :23 1/5, :23 2/5, :25 2/5.

Nearly all horses decelerate on the dirt, very few can and do accelerate at the end of the race. It's an optical illusion that the "closers" are actually running faster at the end than they did at the beginning... they're just decelerating at a lesser rate.
And the difference is that you will never see Jazil throw those sort of fractions. His best races have all been run in fractions between 24 and 25 the whole way. The mistake today was in taking him back too far early so that he was running slower than 25. It is a total oversimplication to categorize any horse who starts from deep as a closer. There are two totally different groups of horses that start near the back. The closers are the ones that have a late kick that will be better or worse depending on how fast they are forced to go early. The plodders are the horses that just run the same speed the whole way. You have late pace in your figures. You have to have seen that there are certain of your closers that have a late kick that totally varies dependant on how fast they go early and others, like Jazil, that are remarkably similar every race. Those ones actually probably have their late speed improve with added distance in your figures since finishing between 24 and 25 at 12 furlongs is much more impressive than at 6 furlongs.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-05-2007, 02:56 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

He ran decent for a suck up 2nd behind a horse who was able to dictate his own pace even after a clumsy start. Take the Bluff got pounded to 3/1, late money rules at the Big A. Kind of stinks for those people who thought they were getting 6/1 with like 4 mtp.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-05-2007, 02:58 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Good boy! (no one please bite my head off, this is my favorite horse in training )
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:00 PM
Buffymommy's Avatar
Buffymommy Buffymommy is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In a little world all my own...
Posts: 3,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
Good boy! (no one please bite my head off, this is my favorite horse in training )

No biting of heads. He is a nice horse. I want him to win more races to earn some respect from others. He did win the Belmont. I like him too. Not my fave horse in training, but I do like him.
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawaken.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.