|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-04-2021, 11:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Steve, do you have the Beyer for Youre to Blame in the fifth on Saturday?
|
|
#2
10-04-2021, 11:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
|
|
#3
10-04-2021, 12:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks, Steve. I was interested because I thought Jack Christopher’s Beyer came back a little high, since it was the slowest Champagne(when run at a mile) since 1989. The mile time for the fifth on Saturday was virtually the same as JC’s final time 3 races later, so the number makes sense.
|
|
#4
10-04-2021, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
10-04-2021, 09:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought Jack Christopher’s Beyer of 93 was a little high for a race that was the slowest Champagne since 1989. So I wanted to compare it to the dirt routes that were run earlier on the card. The 4th race a 40 n2l claimer was not comparable, so I went to the 5th race, an 80 optional claimer @ 8 1/2 furlongs that the mile split was 1:37:2, one tick slower than JC’s mile. When that race came back with a 91 Beyer, I could see how JC was awarded a 93. However, I still feel the time of the Champagne was very mediocre, particularly the final 1/4 in 26:1. We shall see.
|
|
#6
10-04-2021, 09:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
|
|
#7
10-05-2021, 07:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, I am aware of that, but I don’t think an opening 1/4 of 23:4 should impact the final quarter that negatively. Like I said, we shall see.
|
Hybrid Mode
