![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well, none of us who were trying to hit the Grand Slam counted on Discreet Lover's (or as Larry was calling him for most of the race Discreet Image
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ROI
Of course since we did NOT include SA R12 ![]() ![]() MY ROI HORSE WON! ![]() Figures 2 - Travieza, Bay Filly, 3, by Into Mischief ![]() - Bellezza Rosso by Tapit Fractions: :213, :432, 1:061, 1:122 (:21.79, :43.42, 1:06.22, 1:12.42) # Horse Jockey Weight Win Place Show 2 Travieza Bejarano Rafael 120 44.40 13.60 7.80 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Still, that's one of the reasons that we play the ROI contest; to get experience in making wagers that we might not ordinarily make at the track or at a racino. I'm always reluctant to spread too much in the final leg, since the GS strategy is different than a pick 4. I like to spread in the earlier legs hoping to hit multiple times in several legs (once hit twice in each of the three early legs and had 8 winning combinations on one ticket), but then try to single if at all possible in the final leg since if a favorite wins the final leg the GS payoff can be a LOT smaller than a pick 4. I try to avoid the embarrassing situation of actually hitting an exotic bet but ending up with less money than I wagered because I played too many combinations, but that doesn't always work out for me, as Real Quiet can attest. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() You are right about the "embarrassing situation." Considering it only paid $103 dollars with a $93 winner in the last leg, it likely would have been a pittance with either Thunder Snow or Diversify and Gronkowski too. |