![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() When I've heard that number bandied about before it was said that the BCBC accounts for 20% of on-track handle, not all-sources handle.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's like paying to get into a contest where you get a $10 bankroll and other players $2500.
Or some players at poker table get to draw twice. If some are allowed special access, why would the average player bother to play anymore? Might as well play the lottery. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() How is this related to arbitrage?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() There are multiple ways to bet a horse to win in the paramutuals, and they do not yield equivalent win odds. If you have access to last second odds with a computer ready to instantly analyze the data and make bets, you can take advantage of those differences.
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, I used to do this for baseball, but I'd have to watch lines at multiple books religiously.
I did figure out a way to bet both sides in baseball games where the gain was much much higher, but there was alot of risk involved. It really wasn't arbitrage. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The only ways to negate this--short of banning CRW outfits, which just isn't going to happen with how much handle they produce--are 1.) For exchange wagering to become the national standard or 2.) For every track and ADW to have conditional wagering options. The first remedy would likely take over a decade to implement, but the second one would be relatively easy and could be accomplished within a year. But enough people have to make a stink about this for anything to change. So far, it has mostly gone under-reported.
|