8/26 (SAR): 148th Travers Day (5 G1's, G2 undercard)

[pointman]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Songbird actually won. You idiots just haven't seen the real photo.

[10 pnt move up]

WTF has happened to Cloud Computing and Always Dreaming. How fluke were those Derby and Preakness wins?

[cakes44]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

WTF has happened to Cloud Computing and Always Dreaming. How fluke were those Derby and Preakness wins?

Always Dreaming = Super Saver

[RHT2004]

108 beyer for West Coast. Massive performance. Clear cut leader of this division at this point.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by RHT2004

108 beyer for West Coast. Massive performance. Clear cut leader of this division at this point.

Forever Unbridled then gets a what, 98? race was definitely not fast.

[RHT2004]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

Forever Unbridled then gets a what, 98? race was definitely not fast.

101-103? Probably big timeform considering the crawl she ran into.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by RHT2004

101-103? Probably big timeform considering the crawl she ran into.

I dont think it was the crawl, think it was average for 9 F

The travers pace was a little more solid though.

[Alabama Stakes]

Originally Posted by RHT2004

101-103? Probably big timeform considering the crawl she ran into.

If you look at her races, the slower the pace, the better she runs.

[Crown@club]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

WTF has happened to Cloud Computing and Always Dreaming. How fluke were those Derby and Preakness wins?

I was at Lookin at Lee fan. I thought he was improving coming off a nice one in the Arkansas Derby and the Kentucky Derby. Then.....blah.

[cakes44]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

WTF has happened to Cloud Computing and Always Dreaming. How fluke were those Derby and Preakness wins?

Put an X through the Preakness, and where is CC's legit race? He's a fluke.

[RHT2004]

[quote=cakes44;1098808]Put an X through the Preakness, and where is CC's legit race? He's a fluke.[/QUOT


This shows a real lack of knowledge. He has definitely run 2 clunkers, but his first 4 races were all very good.

[cakes44]

[quote=RHT2004;1098809]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Put an X through the Preakness, and where is CC's legit race? He's a fluke.[/QUOT


This shows a real lack of knowledge. He has definitely run 2 clunkers, but his first 4 races were all very good.

Sounds good monopoly $$ man...please give me all the positive from his perfect trip Gotham where he got absolutely dusted by J Boys Echo, who just plain sucks. No phone a friend to the Batman-to-your-Robin Serling either stud.

[cakes44]

Glad you had him in the Preakness(can't remember who else picked him...my memory is getting bad...), but the horse isn't good.

[RHT2004]

[quote=cakes44;1098811]

Originally Posted by RHT2004

Sounds good monopoly $$ man...please give me all the positive from his perfect trip Gotham where he got absolutely dusted by J Boys Echo, who just plain sucks. No phone a friend to the Batman-to-your-Robin Serling either stud.

I guess the Preakness where he was right on top of the pace and ran down the 2yr old champ was bad. Clueless......
And he was way against the track in the Aqu race.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Sounds good monopoly $$ man...please give me all the positive from his perfect trip Gotham where he got absolutely dusted by J Boys Echo, who just plain sucks. No phone a friend to the Batman-to-your-Robin Serling either stud.

This is very stupid.

I would also bet a significant amount of money that RHT bets more than you a year.

[10 pnt move up]

The horse I will probably be most against from last weekend is Practical Joke.

He had a dream setup, rail trip, and he wins nicely in a slowish time. Now I dont know when he faces better horses but whenever it is I imagine he creates value.