Should Hillary have been charged in email scandal?

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

While discussing ethics......
I have seen next to nothing mentioned about two suits against the prrsumptive nominee for fraud. One in calidornia, one in new york...and then two suits quashed in fla and tx after donations made to two campaigns.

At any rate, its a damn shame our two main parties have people with questionable judgement or worse, vying to be president. The money men sure have set up one hell of a system.

But no one was discussing ethics. We are discussing a tyrannical abuse of power at the highest level of this administration.

A lil' different than getting your panties in a knot over a couple of unhappy Trump University students...but I digress.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system

>>>To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.<<<

Let that sink in a moment.

When the Government is above the law, the Citizens are below the law.

That's Tyranny.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

But no one was discussing ethics. We are discussing a tyrannical abuse of power at the highest level of the former administration.



>>>To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.<<<

Let that sink in a moment.

When the Government is above the law, the Citizens are below the law.

That's Tyranny.

You are talking about the Dumya Bush years, right

[Danzig]

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57...b0416464114ff2

A man of integrity...until he didnt do what the gop wanted?

[bigrun]

The media reaction to George W. Bush's email controversy

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...l-controversy/

The George W. Bush email scandal the media has conveniently forgotten

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/12/the_...otten_partner/

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by bigrun

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...l-controversy/






http://www.salon.com/2015/03/12/the_...otten_partner/

That is all completely different, cuz..... (R). And because it is not a clinton

[OldDog]

...met for over 3 hours with 5 attorneys present and Comey said they did not record or save a transcript. You know, just like anyone else

[Danzig]

Amazing. Gop praises the fbi director to the heavens.... chaffetz was asked if the gop would accept a decision not to indict, and he said

“Oh, probably. Because we do believe in James Comey.”

“I do think that in all of government, he is a man of integrity and honesty,” he said of Comey during a June 6 appearance on Fox News’ “Outnumbered.”

“His finger is on the pulse of this,” Chaffetz continued. “Nothing happens without him, and I think he is going to be the definitive person to make a determination or a recommendation.”

And paul ryan said?

“James Comey is a real standup guy,” Ryan said in a Tuesday radio interview with Charlie Sykes on Right Wisconsin. “He’s the FBI director. I do believe that his integrity is unequaled. I know U.S. attorneys who serve in Congress who just claim he is such a strong man of integrity.”

And do note that:
Comey is a Republican who served as deputy attorney general under President George W. Bush. And donated to the last two gop presidential nominees.

So, he was all these things to the gop, but because he did not indict....what? He no longer has integrity? The gop members were wrong before when praising him, or wrong now when they disagree with him? And how can they excoriate him on the hill, call his findings into question, question his integrity, and then use whst he said in his press conference when he bashed the hell out of hilary?!
I seear, the gop would eff up a wet dream.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by OldDog

...met for over 3 hours with 5 attorneys present and Comey said they did not record or save a transcript. You know, just like anyone else

Yet, members of congress have demanded the transcript of the fbi interview. You think they would ask for something that did not exist?