A funny thing happened on the way to the coronation...

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Tom DeLay: The Feds are ready to indict Clinton:

>>>"They're ready to recommend an indictment, and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they're going public. So one way or another, either she's going to be indicted and that process begins, or we try her in the public eye with her campaign,” he told the conservative news outlet. “One way or another, she's going to have to face these charges."<<<

http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...indict-clinton

Ruh Roh

Could we really see a perp walk, live on TV, handcuffs and all?

[Danzig]

no.
I know you guys just know she's going to get indicted....but don't hold your breath

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

no.
I know you guys just know she's going to get indicted....but don't hold your breath

Yeah, the fact that Russia, China, and Iran in all likelyhood now have accessed some of the most top secret State Department communications is no big whoop.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/21/fo...-server-video/

Just another vast right wing conspiracy.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Yeah, the fact that Russia, China, and Iran in all likelyhood now have accessed some of the most top secret State Department communications is no big whoop.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/21/fo...-server-video/

Just another vast right wing conspiracy.

If fairness Rude , I don't think she is saying she shouldn't be indicted just that she probably won't. I agree she is long time member of the ruling class in this country and you can be sure has plenty of favors to call in. GBA

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

If fairness Rude , I don't think she is saying she shouldn't be indicted just that she probably won't. I agree she is long time member of the ruling class in this country and you can be sure has plenty of favors to call in. GBA

that's what I'm saying, she probably won't be. when the foxes guard the henhouse, they can do whatever the hell they want. it's like when the house or senate ethics committee has to call someone out..they won't go too far, because when it's their turn, they don't want that to go too far either.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by joeydb

Could we really see a perp walk, live on TV, handcuffs and all?

If this guy got away with his crimes why can't Hillary

[joeydb]

Hillary got DESTROYED by Bernie, 60% to 38% in New Hampshire.

That is not a good sign. Lost every demographic group except senior citizens.

She may very well still get the nomination, due to superdelegates and their ability to vote independently at the convention, but the "enthusiasm gap" in past week has been severely understated.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by joeydb

Hillary got DESTROYED by Bernie, 60% to 38% in New Hampshire.

That is not a good sign. Lost every demographic group except senior citizens.

She may very well still get the nomination, due to superdelegates and their ability to vote independently at the convention, but the "enthusiasm gap" in past week has been severely understated.

Although I hope you are right cause I am for anybody but Clinton however don't you think you are overblowing her loss considering Bernie is a Senator from Vermont? If he lost there I would have to think his cause is completely hopeless.

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by jms62

Although I hope you are right cause I am for anybody but Clinton however don't you think you are overblowing her loss considering Bernie is a Senator from Vermont? If he lost there I would have to think his cause is completely hopeless.

All I know is I was trying to book tickets on a Spanish website last night while also listening to Trump's victory speech and I'm not sure which one I was having more trouble understanding. At least I could use Google Translate for the Spanish.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by jms62

Although I hope you are right cause I am for anybody but Clinton however don't you think you are overblowing her loss considering Bernie is a Senator from Vermont? If he lost there I would have to think his cause is completely hopeless.

Jim, she was up 44 points on Bernie last February. This whole nonsense that "Bernie is a neighbor" is pathetic spin. She has been completely exposed for the fraud she is and now in deep, deep water.

http://www.conservativeoutfitters.co...-voters-to-see

How does Bloomberg save the Dems? Hasn't he's already missed enough registration deadlines to not get 270 electoral votes? Why isn't this being brought up?

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Jim, she was up 44 points on Bernie last February. This whole nonsense that "Bernie is a neighbor" is pathetic spin. She has been completely exposed for the fraud she is and now in deep, deep water.

http://www.conservativeoutfitters.co...-voters-to-see

How does Bloomberg save the Dems? Hasn't he's already missed enough registration deadlines to not get 270 electoral votes? Why isn't this being brought up?

Hopefully you are right and he keeps the momentum going... I was more taking a shot on this typical Joey Drive by. The guy who is the Lonestar of political handicapping

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Jim, she was up 44 points on Bernie last February. This whole nonsense that "Bernie is a neighbor" is pathetic spin. She has been completely exposed for the fraud she is and now in deep, deep water.

http://www.conservativeoutfitters.co...-voters-to-see

How does Bloomberg save the Dems? Hasn't he's already missed enough registration deadlines to not get 270 electoral votes? Why isn't this being brought up?

No, she wasnt ahead like that last feb. Most in nh werent sure who they would support, with clinton ahead of warren in 2 of 15, because people still didnt know for sure who was in the mix yet.
I went back thru pollls to look st how it unfolded, and sanders has been popular in nh for sometime. His iowa showing helped him, as did his efforts to get people iut to vote.
I hope he can continue his nh ways elsewhere, and get the nomination.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

No, she wasnt ahead like that last feb. Most in nh werent sure who they would support, with clinton ahead of warren in 2 of 15, because people still didnt know for sure who was in the mix yet.
I went back thru pollls to look st how it unfolded, and sanders has been popular in nh for sometime. His iowa showing helped him, as did his efforts to get people iut to vote.
I hope he can continue his nh ways elsewhere, and get the nomination.

Wrong. Again.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...mary-3351.html

In January of 2015: Clinton 56.4%, Sanders 6.8%
In February of 2015: Clinton 56.8%, Sanders 10.0%

She had a 49.6 point lead in January 2015 and a 46.8 point lead in February. It was worse than 44 points, I was being kind.

Secondly, As far as "most in NH weren't sure who they would support" is also incorrect. This is a famous misinterpretation of the Primary rules of NH.

In NH, you may choose to be registered as "Undeclared" up until the moment you cast your vote. Then you register for either party, get that party's ballot, and vote. Immediately following, you have the option of going to the "return to undeclared" table and switching back to being Undeclared.

So this nonsense that "40% of NH was undecided going to the polls" is misleading and untrue.

The majority of the residents knew exactly who they were voting for, the media just had no idea.



You may want to consider qualifying your absolute statements if you are going to talk out of your asz.