Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:30 PM
repent repent is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
It's also a way for a stud farm to boost and help their own stallions in the yearling markets by entering into foal shares and buying said foal when he/she enters the ring.

yeah but he went in the ring as a raced 2YO in November.

what you guys makes sense, I just found it odd that they went to auction when one half of the partnership was willing to buy out the other.
I dont know a lot about that part of the business, which is why I asked.


Repent
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:31 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by repent
yeah but he went in the ring as a raced 2YO in November.

what you guys makes sense, I just found it odd that they went to auction when one half of the partnership was willing to buy out the other.
I dont know a lot about that part of the business, which is why I asked.


Repent
I would guess that maybe they themslves had no idea what the fair market value was. I think they probably had a predetermined price as which they would stop if noone except them was bidding. They aren't stupid guys, to say the least.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:31 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Was he sold this November, or last? He was away a llllooonng time before today.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:33 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by repent
yeah but he went in the ring as a raced 2YO in November.

what you guys makes sense, I just found it odd that they went to auction when one half of the partnership was willing to buy out the other.
I dont know a lot about that part of the business, which is why I asked.


Repent
I was speaking of another way that partnerships work with foal shares, not of Half Ours. Isn't he 3 now?

There is always the chance too that someone else would have stepped in and paid a lot for him as well, look at Spring at Last for instance. You never know what could happen in the ring.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:40 PM
repent repent is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek
I was speaking of another way that partnerships work with foal shares, not of Half Ours. Isn't he 3 now?

There is always the chance too that someone else would have stepped in and paid a lot for him as well, look at Spring at Last for instance. You never know what could happen in the ring.

yeah,
I mistyped.

he is 3.
good catch.


Repent
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-14-2006, 06:18 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
He looked very good today.
Very impressive. Did you get the nuances of his difficult trip?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-14-2006, 06:28 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Even in the fog he didn't look like six million bucks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-14-2006, 07:02 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

according to the article i read, both halves wanted the horse, but didn't want to remain in partnership. the losing partner was the immediate under-bidder on the horse.

shouldn't he change the name to neenerneener,he'sallminenow? mmm, nah, too many letters.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-14-2006, 07:06 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig188
according to the article i read, both halves wanted the horse, but didn't want to remain in partnership. the losing partner was the immediate under-bidder on the horse.

shouldn't he change the name to neenerneener,he'sallminenow? mmm, nah, too many letters.
I think the underbidder was relieved.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.