Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 12-21-2015, 11:14 AM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NavalOrange View Post
Not sure about your logic here or what you are trying to say. It does not matter what the odds are. They get paid based on the purse not the odds, so they would be splitting the same amount of money regardless of who wins or comes in second.
I am sure they would never stiff an odds on favorite in a cheap purse race in order for an associate to make a betting score that far exceeds the 10% they were to make on the purse. I am also sure they would never ride in a manner to burn out or interfere in any way a contending horse when one or the other is on a live horse and theirs not so much.

The above NEVER EVER could possibly happen under any circumstances nor has it ever happened in the history of the sport. The perception that there is potential for such shenanigans by allowing both to ride in the same race is simply nonsensical thinking.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.