Supreme Court decides 6-3 ACA subsidies are legal

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i figured they'd rule the subsidies would continue. like i said at a CE class, if the state chose to use the federal exchange, doesn't that then become that states exchange?

there's something wrong tho when legislators pass a bill, and then sue over the language that they put in the bill.

What I found fascinating about the case is that the plaintiffs named really didn't have standing to even be a part of the case:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...eputation.html

There were people who thought the Supreme Court would dismiss based on the plaintiff's not having legal standing to bring the case. Which might have been perceived as a punt. This is better. Also, Scalia's rage is hilarious.