![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
tywizard, what should the % be ? I know it's 100% plus takeout which I think is 20% to 24% here.
I think a 145% line is highly dubious as to the motive. I think it's fishy. Maybe essentially it's accurate in ranking, but it serves to make people think they are getting bargains, when they aren't. I think it's deceptive. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(The number 143% corresponds to a 30% track takeout.) Here's what you do to calculate that number if you have an odds line. 1. Convert each horse's odds to a "fair" win probability. For example, if a horse is even money, to be "fair" it should win 50% of the time. So the "fair" win probability is 50%. If a horse is 3-1, then the "fair" win probability is 25%. (because with 3-1 odds, if you win 1 out of 4 times, you'll break even. The general rule is this: if the odds are "fair", then WinProbability = 1/(1+Odds) 2. Add up all the "WinProbabilities". If the line is completely fair, it would add to 100%. If the odds have been set lower than fair odds, then the total of the WinProbabilities will be greater than 100%. The 17.5% track takeout at CD will cause the "WinProbabilites" (calclulated from a race's closing odds) to sum to 121% When a futures line is as big as 143%, it's pathetic. It's like betting into a 30% track take. (And the fact that Bovada's didn't include every possible entrant makes it even worse.) --Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
One Lucky Dane out of Derby after being vanned off the track today.
![]() He is going for radiographs.
__________________
Tod Marks Photo - Daybreak over Oklahoma |