No bid contracts? Deja Vu all over again - Page 4

Mortimer · #61 10-27-2008, 12:30 AM

I would not be stunned to see Ventura hit the board, but I would be stunned if Ventura won. That horse is gutless. Easily the toss of the 2 day card for me.

-Hossy-

Mortimer · #62 10-27-2008, 12:34 AM

This message is hidden from Hossy....because he's on your ignore list.

????

Mortimer · #63 10-27-2008, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I got it off an old forge.

-BentMahPud-

OOOOOOOOOO

Mortimer · #64 10-27-2008, 12:36 AM

Adios,amigo.

Mortimer · #65 10-27-2008, 12:36 AM

That means I'm leaving.

Mortimer · #66 10-27-2008, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I's a "SkidsMom 8th Wonder of the World-ism."

Mortimer · #67 10-27-2008, 12:38 AM

Ditto.

SCUDSBROTHER · #68 10-27-2008, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

What am I overlooking? I just hope you never have a child with a disability or whatever.

You're unable to see she made a decision that resulted in unnecessarily bringing a Down Syndrome Child into the world. She's running for an important spot in our Government. All her decisions need to be looked at for quality, and this is a pathetic decision. You're incapable of seeing it as a bad decision, but the results are undeniably poor. DUH!! Keep thinking it's a good decision for a 43 year old to have a 5th child. I'm sure the Catholic Church will agree, and encourage 47 year olds to pump out an extra. Both you and them can then ignore the fact you encouraged the production of a Down Syndrome Child. Your last sentence is that you hope I never have a child with a disability or whatever, but through the whole evening you've encouraged older women(who have given birth multiple times) to have children that have a high chance of being handicapped. You've done nothing but back her poor decision all night long. Even when the punishment (for taking the risk )is directly in front of you, you still encourage them to take the risk. Then you refuse to take responsibility for the result. Somehow, I am called a nut because I dare call a decision (with awful results) a stupid decision. People get cancer from smoking cigarettes. Down Syndrome kids often get produced by woman in their 40's with previous births. Both stupid, and both preventable.

Mortimer · #69 10-27-2008, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

You're unable to see she made a decision that resulted in unnecessarily bringing a Down Syndrome Child into the world. She's running for an important spot in our Government. All her decisions need to be looked at for quality, and this is a pathetic decision. You're incapable of seeing it as a bad decision, but the results are undeniably poor. DUH!! Keep thinking it's a good decision for a 43 year old to have a 5th child. I'm sure the Catholic Church will agree, and encourage 47 year olds to pump out an extra. Both you and them can then ignore the fact you encouraged the production of a Down Syndrome Child. Your last sentence is that you hope I never have a child with a disability or whatever, but through the whole evening you've encouraged older women(who have given birth multiple times) to have children that have a high chance of being handicapped. You've done nothing but back her poor decision all night long. Even when the punishment (for taking the risk )is directly in front of you, you still encourage them to take the risk. Then you refuse to take responsibility for the result. Somehow, I am called a nut because I dare call a decision (with awful results) a stupid decision. People get cancer from smoking cigarettes. Down Syndrome kids often get produced by woman in their 40's with previous births. Both stupid, and both preventable.

This guy's gotta be a riot at anti abortion rallies.

Mortimer · #70 10-27-2008, 01:45 AM

This message is hidden because Mortimer is on your ignore list. He mainly comes here to talk about other posters on the site. To Mortimer, the subjects being written about are not nearly as important as who is doing the writing. To him, that's the subject.

I hate to be a poopie...but this creature is doorknob dumb.

Easy prey.

For those of you having trouble following along at home...it's not you--it's him.

I imagine by tomorrow his signature will grow by 5 paragraphs along with a plethora of specific exemplars.

Don't ya know.

SCUDSBROTHER · #71 10-27-2008, 02:06 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmHbE...eature=related

Sarah Palin's been seen driving around town with a new man....Some guy named "KING."

Danzig · #72 10-27-2008, 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

You're unable to see she made a decision that resulted in unnecessarily bringing a Down Syndrome Child into the world. She's running for an important spot in our Government. All her decisions need to be looked at for quality, and this is a pathetic decision. You're incapable of seeing it as a bad decision, but the results are undeniably poor. DUH!! Keep thinking it's a good decision for a 43 year old to have a 5th child. I'm sure the Catholic Church will agree, and encourage 47 year olds to pump out an extra. Both you and them can then ignore the fact you encouraged the production of a Down Syndrome Child. Your last sentence is that you hope I never have a child with a disability or whatever, but through the whole evening you've encouraged older women(who have given birth multiple times) to have children that have a high chance of being handicapped. You've done nothing but back her poor decision all night long. Even when the punishment (for taking the risk )is directly in front of you, you still encourage them to take the risk. Then you refuse to take responsibility for the result. Somehow, I am called a nut because I dare call a decision (with awful results) a stupid decision. People get cancer from smoking cigarettes. Down Syndrome kids often get produced by woman in their 40's with previous births. Both stupid, and both preventable.

kids=punishment? interesting.

SCUDSBROTHER · #73 10-27-2008, 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

kids=punishment? interesting.

I'm sure she wasn't hoping for a D.S. baby. Yes, when a 43 year old makes the choice to have a 5th child, then they are gambling. Some are gunna be punished for ignoring the odds. A lot of people want to adopt, but I haven't heard many say they want a D.S. child (instead of a healthy child.) Tons of ads for pets, but 3 legged dog isn't a popular breed(yet.) Given a situation, people will accept almost anything in a week or two. Whether it be a death, or a terminal illness. Whatever it is. People accept it, and try to move on. So, they've accepted their punishment, and moved on. They didn't have to have this take place. They could of been responsible enough to stop having kids after 40. She is trying to sell herself as smart. That was stupid.

SCUDSBROTHER · #74 10-27-2008, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I just noticed that. Can't take the heat I guess.

I am not gunna talk to some sick pup(MORTY FROM MARS) that has double meanings for everything(and only the 2nd guy in his head knows what they are.) All I've got to say to that irritant is: take your fkn Schitzo meds, and maybe they'll find something in the Amazon that will cure you eventually. Keep hope alive, btch.