![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The Moss figures are made based on a compressed Beyer Scale. They are not two independent figures, they are tied together. A Moss figure of 89 equals a Beyer figure in the range of 89 to 91. A Moss figure of 81 equals a Beyer figure of 67 to 69. In other words, on the extreme low side of their scale: 56 Moss = 0 Beyer 57 Moss = 3 Beyer 58 Moss = 5 Beyer 59 Moss = 8 Beyer 60 Moss = 11 Beyer 61 Moss = 14 Beyer 62 Moss = 16 Beyer 63 Moss = 19 Beyer The extreme high side: 95 Moss = 106 Beyer 96 Moss = 109 Beyer 97 Moss = 112 Beyer 98 Moss = 115 Beyer 99 Moss = 117 Beyer 100 Moss = 120 Beyer 101 Moss = 123 Beyer 102 Moss = 125 Beyer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think it might be interesting to consider “track weight/variant” when evaluating the strength of any performance. This goes hand-in-hand with track biases that you described in your opening post. Big difference running +20 pace number on a track that’s 3 lengths slow vs 3 lengths fast. Also a different significance using 1st call vs 2nd call I imagine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Excited to follow this thread. Great idea!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dont hold your breath. It's been over 2 years since the last post
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() He made a funny
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|