in the article i posted elsewhere the other day, it showed that the 16 year old who was killed was NOT with his father. even if he had been with him, it didn't make it right. the father shouldn't have been killed by a drone either. i find the drone attacks to be reprehensible-not just against possible militants, but certainly against american citizens. the 'kill lists' are not constitutional, there is no due process involved. how could there be? and just because eric holder said it fits the rules under due process, doesn't mean it does.
|
11-02-2012, 12:29 PM
Threaded Mode