Hey Riot

[Danzig]

but, are they still not prosecuting? i am figuring the decision wont change...but keep fighting the fight.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

but, are they still not prosecuting? i am figuring the decision wont change...but keep fighting the fight.

No, Prosser won't be prosecuted for his workplace violence, and he's very lucky for that. But as an elected official, his years of anger causing problems on the court are now public knowledge.

It's now unquestionably apparent Prosser did exactly what he was accused of, and all the attacks on "the left" by his blindly aggressive defenders makes them look pretty foolish at this point.

Was this made up lies by the left? Nope.

Wiphan? Timmi? Antitrust? You guys are being pretty quiet. Can't admit you were wrong? Your man has admitted he is exactly the angry jackass he was alleged to be.

Wiphan, you especially should just admit you were wrong. You might gain more respect that way.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, Prosser won't be prosecuted for his workplace violence, and he's very lucky for that. But as an elected official, his years of anger causing problems on the court are now public knowledge.

It's now unquestionably apparent Prosser did exactly what he was accused of, and all the attacks on "the left" by his blindly aggressive defenders makes them look pretty foolish at this point.

Was this made up lies by the left? Nope.

Wiphan? Timmi? Antitrust? You guys are being pretty quiet. Can't admit you were wrong? Your man has admitted he is exactly the angry jackass he was alleged to be.

make no mistake here, he is not my man. just because the result is what i expected does not mean, unlike you, that i had a rooting interest at all. had he been charged, i would have been surprised based on the articles i had read on the situation, but not dismayed in the least.
interesting tho that you're calling out wiphan and others for being 'wrong' but you are the only one that i recall guaranteeing prosecution. you do have a way of spinning things.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

make no mistake here, he is not my man. just because the result is what i expected does not mean, unlike you, that i had a rooting interest at all. had he been charged, i would have been surprised based on the articles i had read on the situation, but not dismayed in the least.
interesting tho that you're calling out wiphan and others for being 'wrong' but you are the only one that i recall guaranteeing prosecution. you do have a way of spinning things.

Yes, I thought he would be prosecuted, and he is not. Spin that away. He is lucky the woman he abused in his anger doesn't want to press criminal charges, and just wants it to stop, and him to get help (see her comment on that very subject).

But his anger problems and issues of workplace safety due to Prosser are now public knowledge, and the Chief Justice is even considering making all deliberations public as a method of protection from this happening again (a stunning move, hope it does not happen, actually)

The astounding thing is how Prosser is more concerned, in his deposition, with what the press thinks, and justifying why he's really innocent. He just "found my hands around her neck". He still thinks he's a victim!

But I have been repeatedly told that this is all a lie, Prosser didn't do anything, nothing happened, it's a plot by "the left", Bradley actually attacked Prosser, Prosser is completely innocent - oh, yeah, and that what I have always maintained about Prosser as reported in the press was a lie.

Turns out that's all bull, not the truth. And that's not spin. Prosser did exactly what he was accused of.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Riot

No,
Wiphan? Timmi? Antitrust? You guys are being pretty quiet. Can't admit you were wrong? Your man has admitted he is exactly the angry jackass he was alleged to be.

way.

I was quiet because I have an actual life and dont spend my weekends on Nerdy Trail.

He "touched her neck with one hand and no pain or pressure"

big fucl<ing deal. When you read that it makes you understand why there were no charges given. The guy didnt break the law. There are about 80 trillion more important issues in the world than this crap. You are probably the only person in the country that gives a **** about this issue.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

I was quiet because I have an actual life and dont spend my weekends on Nerdy Trail.

He "touched her neck with one hand and no pain or pressure"

big fucl<ing deal. When you read that it makes you understand why there were no charges given. The guy didnt break the law. There are about 80 trillion more important issues in the world than this crap. You are probably the only person in the country that gives a **** about this issue.

I actually have a family and a life outside of the Nerdy trail politics page as well and arguing with Riot has proved to be pointless. First Riot can't admit when she is wrong. Second when others point out she is wrong she digs in harder and tries to find a way to make her point and finally I really don't care that much about this crap.

I just don't see why Riot continues to Slander someone who she has never met, never had any encounters with and has no knowledge of other than what she reads online. I guess maybe she is still bittter that Prosser took down Kloppenberg in the election.

Go Brewers!

[Riot]

You two are hilarious. You both make exactly the same post (which, I guess, explains alot about "mindset" on the right):

Get angry-snarky and disparage the other person with a personal attack, then allege you are "better than that" while not being so, then say it's not important to you (while you've spent post after post in this thread talking about it), and finally, refusing to acknowlege that Prosser actually did exactly what he was accused of, what you have spent post after post denying he did.

And now you make excuses for his behaviour.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

You two are hilarious. You both make exactly the same post (which, I guess, explains alot about "mindset" on the right):

Get angry-snarky and disparage the other person with a personal attack, then allege you are "better than that" while not being so, then say it's not important to you (while you've spent post after post in this thread talking about it), and finally, refusing to acknowlege that Prosser actually did exactly what he was accused of, what you have spent post after post denying he did.

And now you make excuses for his behaviour.

did he touch her neck? yes

Did he choke her or put her in a choke hold? No

Did Bradley get up quickly and rush in the face of Prosser after he made a comment to The chief Justice? yes

Did it deserve all the media attention? No. Was this a non-issue and should it be a non issue? yes.

You keep making more out of nothing. Even Bradley realizes this, the rest of us can't figure out why you can't.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

did he touch her neck? yes

Did he choke her or put her in a choke hold? No

Did Bradley get up quickly and rush in the face of Prosser after he made a comment to The chief Justice? yes

Did it deserve all the media attention? No. Was this a non-issue and should it be a non issue? yes.

You keep making more out of nothing. Even Bradley realizes this, the rest of us can't figure out why you can't.

Yeah, keep spinning. For goodness sakes, don't bother to read all the documents involved with the case, either (it's clear you have not) - because they really negate your spin attempt

"Oh my God, I'm touching her neck!" - Justice David Prosser

"What does any self-respecting man do when suddenly that man finds that his hands, or part of his hands are on a woman's neck? Get them off the neck as soon as possible." - Justice David Prosser

What do you think about the part where Prosser said iin his disposition that late at night, he walks through the building, and the other judges clerk cries out in fear? What the hell is that craziness all about? What about the other clerks being afraid of his anger?

[timmgirvan]

I think him calling her a bitch is one thing, but I dont condone physical abuse
in any situation! hope this clears things up!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

I think him calling her a bitch is one thing, but I dont condone physical abuse
in any situation! hope this clears things up!

What it clears up is that you haven't got a clue. You don't even realize that the incident with Prosser grabbing Justice Bradley's neck has nothing to do with the different time Prosser called Justice Abrahamson "a bitch" and threatened to "destroy" her.