![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree that conditions should be improved, but recongize that there's an agenda behind the piece and it has nothing to do with improved backstretch conditions.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
So since there is an agenda should they just ignore it? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lets not make this a black white thing.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In this case, the message, however, is obscured by the messenger. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
2. worry about conditions You're a saint! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Newspapers have agendas. They want bad news"
OMG!! Well lets just disregard that article because those god-damned liberal newspapers have an agenda. We've got to keep the facade up that we're the greatest race track on earth and when you come here the fountain in the infield will make you at least two years younger. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
OMG! Poor people have bad living conditions! This is shocking, thank you NY's Hometown Paper. Where would we be without these hard hitting articles. Please.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|