Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2009, 10:29 AM
-BT- -BT- is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 60613
Posts: 2,622
Default Magna did not pay fee in slots bid

it gets weirder and weirder


http://www.drf.com/news/article/101431.html

-bt-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2009, 11:12 AM
smuthg's Avatar
smuthg smuthg is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,010
Default

I'm not sure I understand what the $28.5 Mil fee was for. I can't imagine that it was merely to get the state to consider their bid.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2009, 12:45 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smuthg
I'm not sure I understand what the $28.5 Mil fee was for. I can't imagine that it was merely to get the state to consider their bid.
I believe that is simply for consideration. The impact from the slots in MD on racing and the state in general will be small simply because as usual the politicians have their heads up their asses. A 67% tax? Disgraceful.

Magna probably didnt want to bounce a check so they didnt bother giving up one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2009, 01:10 PM
smuthg's Avatar
smuthg smuthg is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Magna probably didnt want to bounce a check so they didnt bother giving up one.
very good point.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:25 PM
phystech's Avatar
phystech phystech is offline
Narragansett Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smuthg
I'm not sure I understand what the $28.5 Mil fee was for. I can't imagine that it was merely to get the state to consider their bid.

Guess it was like "earnest" money, like when you submit a contract for consideration to buy a house.

Can't believe Magna had large enough balls to make application and not write the required check. Even more difficult to believe is that the slots board would accept the app without the check.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:36 PM
phystech's Avatar
phystech phystech is offline
Narragansett Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I believe that is simply for consideration. The impact from the slots in MD on racing and the state in general will be small simply because as usual the politicians have their heads up their asses. A 67% tax? Disgraceful.

Magna probably didnt want to bounce a check so they didnt bother giving up one.

Every single thing the MD Dem pols have done regarding slots has been disgraceful so why wouldn't the taxation of the revenue be the same?

Add to that the owner of the Baltimore City slots location has to pay $36mil a year in rent to Baltimore for renting the property the slots facility will sit on. And the rent fee was decided by a Dem mayor who stands accused of spending donated gift cards intended for the needy, on herself at Christmas.

And I'll wager all of license bids submitted, with the exception of the Magna bid, will be from a group that will include a member of the MD Democratic party leadership or former MD Dem politician that was agaisnt passing slots when a Rep Gov was in place.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-11-2009, 11:52 AM
-BT- -BT- is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 60613
Posts: 2,622
Default

http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/49152.htm

more people hate poor old frank, shame shame

-bt-
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.