View Single Post
  #2  
Old 05-25-2011, 02:56 PM
wiphan's Avatar
wiphan wiphan is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miller Park
Posts: 980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
That wouldn't be corrected by showing a photo ID, would it?

If those people are registered voters, that's electioneering. Not voter fraud. They are absolutely entitled to vote.

And if they are not registered to vote, they can't vote - can they? - unless they follow the current voter law for provisional voting.

Face it - voter fraud is a red herring for this change.



When the current ID types available to enable one to vote are arbitrarily changed so that only one or two types of ID are now required, and it's markedly more restrictive, that take a particular effort or cost (poll tax) obtain, that's absolutely a restriction of voting rights with the purposeful attempt to disinfranchise particular groups of voters.

Not to mention the changing of dates to register, the residence requirements, etc. This is a blatent attack on voting rights of American citizens, certain demographics deliberately targeted by the RGA, and everyone knows it - it is no secret.



Gee - the very way we do it now?



How would you know there is fraud when you don't see it? Imaginary boogeymen?
In WI you can register to vote day of the election at the polling place.
So bribing people to go vote is electioneering, but requiring them to show a photo id is disenfranchising. I get it now. Thanks
Reply With Quote