Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
You do realize that the player you pass it to needs to score in order to get an assist right? That a shot attempted is counted regardless of whether it goes in or not right? So your versus comparison is not really accurate in the way that you portray it?
Derrick Rose has played 1844 minutes this season. He has taken 22 three point shots. So he takes a three point shot every 84 minutes. Quite relevant these numbers you are using as "facts" when we are having a theoretical discussion.
You want to breakdown things that can't be broken down. Basketball isnt baseball, the absolutes are far greater in baseball. While you are somewhat effected by the park you play in and helped or hurt slightly by the calibur of hitters in front and behind you you basically are on your own at the plate. Same with a pitcher who is effected by the park and the defense behind him. But in the end guys who can hit do about what they are able to do. Same with pitchers. But in basketball you are far more effected statistically by the system your team runs and the players strength and weaknesses around you. I hate to keep bringing up Channng Frye but his example is easily understood. He didnt learn to shoot three point shots over the summer. He has just been allowed (encouraged?) to shoot them this year because the system of offense and team he plays for allows it. There was no stats that could have predicted him going from a guy who shot 20 for 70 for his entire 4 year career to a guy who has shot 120-277 in 53 games this year. If I had said that I thought Channing Frye was going to have a breakout year as a three point shooter this year you would have called me an idiot and said that no way he goes from taking 30 all year to shooting 5 a game. While admittedly there was little chance of me coming up with that hypothesis, there is a 100% chance that I would have got called an idiot and you would have dragged out the stats to "prove" it. The idea that the team I proposed (which can't really happen I found out tonight because of salary cap rules even if they were able to trade Thomas and Hinrich) could mesh and Deng and Rose would sacrifice a few shots when playing with other offensive stars is far less of a stretch than Frye becoming a prolific three point shooter.
|
There is no doubt that system plays a piece in a player's performance. After watching the D'antoni system the last few years, I wouldn't be surprised if anyone short of shaq became a decent three baller especially the way Nash runs it. Frye always showed range although not 3 pt range. I dont think its so much of a stretch at all. He was always a soft perimeter player anyway with no low post game to speak of.
I will say that Rose becoming a decent three point shooter would shock me a whole lot more than Frye becoming one has. Rose becoming a great passer doesnt surprise me because he is already a great passer. He has incredible vision. I never said he didnt. Its just not his game. He isnt a spot up guy and he wants the ball. Wade isnt a spot up guy and wants the ball. Neither of them have range to open up the middle to drive or free up the low post. Thats the point.
I get your point. We simply disagree. Can we move on?