Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Good lord. If one is going to quote me, at least don't change the names of people I talked about?
Chuck, I'm still a registered Republican, so you're just gonna have to chalk me up to naive rather than partisan.
I'm sure it was that dang tricky Fitzergerald just trying to throw me off the trail - saying there are no allegations whatsoever about Obamas behaviour, when he warned the media not to cast aspersions on people just because they are named here - and when he quoted Blago as cursing Obama out for not being willing to pay to play 
The revealing truth about Obama and team, and the content of all those conversations, has to be on the verge of being exposed. Obama already wanted to reveal, but the prosecutor wouldn't let him. It's a cover up! |
Where and when did he say that? You said first news conference? I think you're mistaking comentary afterward from what Fitz said which was
FITZGERALD: Okay. I'm not going to speak for what the president-elect was aware of. We make no allegations that he's aware of anything, and that's as simply as I can put it.
Q In the briefings that President-elect Obama has had over the past weeks with various government departments here, would it be possible for him to have been briefed on what was going on here with regard to this investigation?
MR. FITZGERALD: I'm not going to comment on that. I'm not the briefer. I'm not at those meetings. But I would simply say that this was very close-hold in Washington, and on a need-to-know basis. So I'm -- but I'm not going to -- I'm not the briefer, so I'm not going to represent what happens. But -- I'll leave it at that.
now here's the link to te entire transcript.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008...erence_on.html Please for the love of God show me where P. Fitz exonerates Obama or for that matter anyone?