Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Triple Crown Topics/Archive..
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2008, 09:59 AM
HaloWishingwell's Avatar
HaloWishingwell HaloWishingwell is offline
Ak-Sar-Ben
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 654
Default Eight Belles & Proud Spell

Not good news in the Bloodhorse for those bubble horses with insufficient earnings....


Cindy Jones, assistant to her husband, Larry, said that fillies Proud Spell and Eight Belles both galloped 11/2 miles Wednesday morning. Brereton Jones’ Proud Spell and Fox Hill Farms’ Eight Belles both are probable to be cross-entered in the Derby and the Kentucky Oaks (gr. I). They are scheduled to ship to Churchill Downs Friday and, weather permitting, will breeze Sunday
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:05 AM
Thunder Gulch's Avatar
Thunder Gulch Thunder Gulch is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southland Greyhound Park
Posts: 1,846
Default

I'd bet one goes to the Oaks and the other to the Derby.
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:07 AM
HaloWishingwell's Avatar
HaloWishingwell HaloWishingwell is offline
Ak-Sar-Ben
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 654
Default

Regardless what the final decision is, they will still take up two spots at the draw.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:07 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,933
Default

This is actually a very good thing overall as it will force Churchill to finally change the Derby entry rules. They will either have to start allowing also-eligibles and/or alter the way earnings are calculated and used for eligibility.

Hopefully they will do both.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:10 AM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
This is actually a very good thing overall as it will force Churchill to finally change the Derby entry rules. They will either have to start allowing also-eligibles and/or alter the way earnings are calculated and used for eligibility.

Hopefully they will do both.
I've never understood why they didn't allow a/e's..or at least have a "waiting list" , both still graded earnings based. Was there a reason?
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:12 AM
HaloWishingwell's Avatar
HaloWishingwell HaloWishingwell is offline
Ak-Sar-Ben
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 654
Default

If they allowed also eligibles and the scratches occur after the draw, would the also eligible then take the outer post or just replace the scratched horse post?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:14 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
I've never understood why they didn't allow a/e's..or at least have a "waiting list" , both still graded earnings based. Was there a reason?
I assume one major problem is it screws with their " Derby Draw " though there is a simple solution to that.....the AEs are automatically assigned posts 21-24. I imagine that connections would rather accept the lousy post than be excluded.

I'm sure they also have concerns about refunds, which in all fairness is a novice-fan protection, but the solution to that is to make scratch time for the Derby Friday morning before Derby wagering begins. I would imagine the connections of fillies that have cross entered in the Oaks would know by then which race they are running in.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:16 AM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HaloWishingwell
If they allowed also eligibles and the scratches occur after the draw, would the also eligible then take the outer post or just replace the scratched horse post?
Maybe if you are double entered, you don't get the opportunity to take part in the respective post draw, but have to take what is left?
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:18 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Or change the conditions of the Derby to not allow horses to be entered if they are already entered in another race.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:20 AM
-BT- -BT- is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 60613
Posts: 2,622
Default

i hope they draw hole #1 and #20

then we'd widdle the field down to 18

-bt-
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:20 AM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Or change the conditions of the Derby to not allow horses to be entered if they are already entered in another race.
We are slowly working towards common sense solutions which means it will never happen
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:20 AM
justindew's Avatar
justindew justindew is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
This is actually a very good thing overall as it will force Churchill to finally change the Derby entry rules. They will either have to start allowing also-eligibles and/or alter the way earnings are calculated and used for eligibility.

Hopefully they will do both.
Which will happen first: New Derby entry process, or the ability to bet on more than 23 individual horses in the future wager?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:26 AM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Or change the conditions of the Derby to not allow horses to be entered if they are already entered in another race.
Yeah, that seems a no brainer. Once this precendent is set won't every trainer with a top contender enter a filly with earnings and then scratch just to reduce the size of the field?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:26 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justindew
Which will happen first: New Derby entry process, or the ability to bet on more than 23 individual horses in the future wager?

I think they could both well happen next year. The pools for the Derby futures were very weak......if that doesn't get their attention then nothing will.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:28 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Or change the conditions of the Derby to not allow horses to be entered if they are already entered in another race.
They don't have to do that Chuck. They just have to allow for also-eligibles which covers many possibilities.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:32 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
They don't have to do that Chuck. They just have to allow for also-eligibles which covers many possibilities.
Thats true but I dont think there is any chance of them adding AE's.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:34 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
This is actually a very good thing overall as it will force Churchill to finally change the Derby entry rules. They will either have to start allowing also-eligibles and/or alter the way earnings are calculated and used for eligibility.

Hopefully they will do both.
Agree on both points.

I have no problem with either of them trying the Derby, especially in this comical year, but I'd love to have seen a "test run" against the boys a la Winning Colors to have earned the graded money to run.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:42 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
Agree on both points.

I have no problem with either of them trying the Derby, especially in this comical year, but I'd love to have seen a "test run" against the boys a la Winning Colors to have earned the graded money to run.
You should be repremanded for mentioning WC in the same thought as these 2, even in a year like this.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-23-2008, 10:57 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
You should be repremanded for mentioning WC in the same thought as these 2, even in a year like this.
HA!
Not a comparison of talent but rather she EARNED her way into the Derby by destroying the SA Derby, not by racking up $$ in the Fantasy, etc.


Why Moonlight out today?
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-23-2008, 11:02 AM
cakes44's Avatar
cakes44 cakes44 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,735
Default

I like Eight Belles chances. Kushy trips going 1 1/16(at most) vs females and being a being a daughter of Unbridled's Song are things I definitely look for in a Derby winner.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.