Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:42 AM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
i think i know what he is saying kev, i think phil has more shots than tiger , but , tiger is the better player

and I thought you knew what you are talking about!! Dont let Scuds influence you on this... There is NOBODY who has more shots than Tiger. Though Phil does have a lot of shots too.. he is not and never will be Tiger.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:43 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

F.uck yeah!!
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:44 AM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Booom!!!! Come On David!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:45 AM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

On talent alone, Phil's a freak. Believe what you want, but he's got the most talent.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:47 AM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
and I thought you knew what you are talking about!! Dont let Scuds influence you on this... There is NOBODY who has more shots than Tiger. Though Phil does have a lot of shots too.. he is not and never will be Tiger.
the analogy that you and kev are mixing up is talent and better

talent alone does not mean you are a better player

scuds never said tiger wasn't the better player , talent in golf is a subjective measure

tiger gets the ball into the hole better than anyone ever with the exception of perhaps Jack .

Phil in my opinon has more shots - he is more creative - he just doens't get the ball in the hole in some key spots , where as tiger always does
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:48 AM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
On talent alone, Phil's a freak. Believe what you want, but he's got the most talent.

Great putt there on 17

Dat boy got talent!!!
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:49 AM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
and I thought you knew what you are talking about!! Dont let Scuds influence you on this... There is NOBODY who has more shots than Tiger. Though Phil does have a lot of shots too.. he is not and never will be Tiger.
Who gave the mic to the feisty dyke?
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:49 AM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
the analogy that you and kev are mixing up is talent and better
talent alone does not mean you are a better player

scuds never said tiger wasn't the better player , talent in golf is a subjective measure

tiger gets the ball into the hole better than anyone ever with the exception of perhaps Jack .

Phil in my opinon has more shots - he is more creative - he just doens't get the ball in the hole in some key spots , where as tiger always does

Im not mixing anything up, Phil is not as talented as Tiger with a golf club in his hand....plain and simple.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:52 AM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Phil being MORE talented than Tiger reminds me of that fat camp joke DrugS posted about the stars of racing today.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:53 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bleh. Come on Glover choke it up.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:53 AM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
Im not mixing anything up, Phil is not as talented as Tiger with a golf club in his hand....plain and simple.

we just saw phil miss 2 putts from 6 feet and in when he was tied for the lead in the final round of the us open

tiger never ever ever misses those putts when he is on the lead that is why he is #1 and phil is #2 - that is why he is the better player , but none of that has to do with talent, it all has to do with mental makeup of the individual
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:56 AM
MaTH716's Avatar
MaTH716 MaTH716 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,438
Default

that blows
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:57 AM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
we just saw phil miss 2 putts from 6 feet and in when he was tied for the lead in the final round of the us open

tiger never ever ever misses those putts when he is on the lead that is why he is #1 and phil is #2 - that is why he is the better player , but none of that has to do with talent, it all has to do with mental makeup of the individual
Making or missing that putt has nothing to do with talent. I maintain that OVERALL, Tiger is more talented than Phil. Phil has more talent with the wedges, but combining the entire package, Tiger is more talented that Phil.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:01 PM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
Making or missing that putt has nothing to do with talent. I maintain that OVERALL, Tiger is more talented than Phil. Phil has more talent with the wedges, but combining the entire package, Tiger is more talented that Phil.

talent is subjective

scuds' statement cannot be factually proved to be wrong
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:03 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
talent is subjective

scuds' statement cannot be factually proved to be wrong
Very true...its all opinion.

That putt Phil hit on 17 has to be one of the worst putts ever. He left it short from 4 feet.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:05 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
Making or missing that putt has nothing to do with talent. I maintain that OVERALL, Tiger is more talented than Phil. Phil has more talent with the wedges, but combining the entire package, Tiger is more talented that Phil.

I dont know about that when it comes to bunkers. Tiger is as good as it gets from the sand.. Maybe Lefty is equal on sand shots.


Remember last year before Woods took a half year off from golf... and according to the world rankings there was as much distance between the #1 golfer in the world (Woods) and the #2 golfer (Lefty) than #2 and like #1000.

Yeah, Lefty is more talented
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:08 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
talent is subjective

scuds' statement cannot be factually proved to be wrong

I think Mine That Bird is more talented than Secretariat.

talent is subjective

my statement cannont be factually proven to be wrong.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:10 PM
-BT- -BT- is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 60613
Posts: 2,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
Booom!!!! Come On David!!!!

thats who i was pulling for, bad break on 17.

i used to love watching duval back in the day, he's gained a few lbs but he's still rocking the oakely frog skins, all class right dere

-bt-
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:10 PM
MaTH716's Avatar
MaTH716 MaTH716 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,438
Default

Rootin for a double here for Glover in the worst way.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:11 PM
-BT- -BT- is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 60613
Posts: 2,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaTH716
Rootin for a double here for Glover in the worst way.

thats just wrong.... anyone but ricky bobby barnes and i'm a happy camper

-bt-
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.